| Literature DB >> 14550833 |
Steinar Hunskaar1, Kathryn Burgio, Ananias Diokno, A Regula Herzog, Kelm Hjälmås, Marie Carmela Lapitan.
Abstract
Understanding the epidemiology (distribution and determinants) of urinary incontinence (UI), as well as its natural history is a very important issue. In this article, we discuss prevalence, incidence, natural history, and the variations that may be related to race and ethnicity. We focus on epidemiologic population comprising community-dwelling women who are not institutionalized. Our review clearly shows that there is a lack of advanced epidemiologic analyses. Variables that better characterize UI include frequency measure, quantity of urine loss, duration, type, and severity. These factors should be incorporated into basic study design so that more advanced and informative analyses may be conducted.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14550833 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00755-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urology ISSN: 0090-4295 Impact factor: 2.649