Literature DB >> 27629119

Are suburethral slings less successful in the elderly?

Alexandriah Alas1, Orawee Chinthakanan2, Luis Espaillat1, Leon Plowright1, Vivian Aguilar1, G Willy Davila3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to evaluate the success of suburethral slings in women ≥70 years of age.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent suburethral sling placement. Subjects were separated into three groups: ≤50 years of age (group 1), 51 to 69 years of age (group 2), and ≥70 years of age (group 3). The primary aim was to evaluate success as defined by ≥ improved on a validated patient improvement satisfaction score and a negative postoperative standardized stress test.
RESULTS: There were 1,464 subjects. Mean age was 44.51 ± 4.25 (n = 296) for group 1, 60.5 ± 5.28 (n = 680) for group 2, and 77.68 ± 5.41 (n = 488) for group 3. The median follow-up was 26 (6-498) weeks, 45 (6-498) weeks, and 42 (6-543) weeks, for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated no difference in sling success according to age stratification. Lower success was associated with having had a previous sling (adjusted OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.12-0.5), having detrusor overactivity (adjusted OR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.28-0.69), and having a history of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) for ≥ 4 years (adjusted OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.31-0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in sling success between the elderly and younger populations. However, those with previous sling surgery or a long standing history of UUI may be at a higher risk of failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Midurethral slings; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629119     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3132-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mixed incontinence: current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vik Khullar; Linda Cardozo; Roger Dmochowski
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  The effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life in older nursing home residents.

Authors:  Catherine E Dubeau; Samuel E Simon; John N Morris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence in women over 80 years.

Authors:  Kobi Stav; Peter L Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia; Lore Schierlitz; Yik N Lim; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Negative impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life, a cross-sectional study among women aged 49-61 years enrolled in the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  Karim Saadoun; Virginie Ringa; Xavier Fritel; Noëlle Varnoux; Marie Zins; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Bladder instability. Is the primary defect in the urethra?

Authors:  J R Hindmarsh; P T Gosling; A M Deane
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1983-12

6.  Urethral afferent nerve activity affects the micturition reflex; implication for the relationship between stress incontinence and detrusor instability.

Authors:  S Y Jung; M O Fraser; H Ozawa; O Yokoyama; M Yoshiyama; W C De Groat; M B Chancellor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Surgery for urinary incontinence in women 65 years and older: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karin Franzen; Gunnel Andersson; Jenny Odeberg; Patrik Midlöv; Eva Samuelsson; Karin Stenzelius; Margareta Hammarström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Tension free vaginal tape: a procedure for all ages.

Authors:  Sabeena Allahdin; Carolyn A McKinley; Tahir A Mahmood
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Results of the tension-free vaginal tape technique in the elderly.

Authors:  Ségolène Sevestre; Calin Ciofu; Bruno Deval; Olivier Traxer; Gérard Amarenco; François Haab
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The effect of age on outcomes of sling surgery for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Mark S Litwin; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Larissa V Rodríguez
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Choosing the right sling for your patient.

Authors:  Stephen S Steele; Gregory G Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Outcomes and failure risks in mid-urethral sling insertion in elderly and old age with urodynamic stress incontinence.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Nagashu Shailaja; Yiap Loong Tan; Ming-Ping Wu; Sandy Chua; Kwok Weng Roy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?

Authors:  Wojciech Majkusiak; Andrzej Pomian; Edyta Horosz; Aneta Zwierzchowska; Paweł Tomasik; Wojciech Lisik; Ewa Barcz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.