Literature DB >> 14550482

After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition?

William G Hayward1.   

Abstract

A debate on whether object representations capture isolated viewpoints or ranges of views has dominated research in object recognition in recent years, but now seems to be waning. Rather than assume a narrow model in which either structural or view information is used to recognize an object, researchers have begun to examine how these properties might be used cooperatively. A recent paper by Foster and Gilson confirms sensitivity to both types of information, which combine in an additive framework to predict recognition performance.

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550482     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  16 in total

1.  Effect of image orientation on the eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-05-21

2.  Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition.

Authors:  Tandra Ghose; Zili Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Some views are better than others: evidence for a visual bias in object views self-generated by toddlers.

Authors:  Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Shelley Swain; Alfredo Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-01-11

5.  Relations among early object recognition skills: Objects and letters.

Authors:  Elaine Augustine; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith; Erica Longfield
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-04-01

6.  Intrinsic orientation and study viewpoint in recognizing spatial structure of a shape.

Authors:  Xiaoou Li; Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

7.  Bias effects in the possible/impossible object decision test with matching objects.

Authors:  Anja Soldan; H John Hilton; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

8.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age.

Authors:  Alfredo F Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-01

9.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in visual object recognition precede the shape bias in early noun learning.

Authors:  Meagan Yee; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.