Literature DB >> 1453974

Effect of local context of responding on human judgment of causality.

P Reed1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of various relationships between a response (pressing the space bar of a computer) and an outcome (a triangle flashing on a screen) on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response. In Experiment 1, when responses were required to be temporarily isolated from each other prior to an outcome, ratings of the causal effectiveness of the responses were higher than in a condition in which the probability of an outcome following a response was the same but in which no temporal isolation was required. In Experiment 2, when a number of responses were required to be emitted temporally close to the outcome, ratings of the causal effectiveness of the responses were lower than in a condition in which the probability of an outcome following a response was the same but in which no temporal proximity was required. These results suggest that, in addition to the overall probability that an outcome will follow a response, the local context of responding at the time an outcome is presented is critical in influencing ratings of causal effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453974     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.

Authors:  G B Chapman; S J Robbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

2.  Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity.

Authors:  D R Shanks; A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

3.  Marking effects in instrumental performance on DRH schedules.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1989-11

4.  The display of information and the judgment of contingency.

Authors:  W C Ward; H M Jenkins
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1965-09

5.  A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.

Authors:  H Shaklee; D Tucker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-09

6.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?

Authors:  L B Alloy; L Y Abramson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-12
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Charlotte Dack; Phil Reed; Louise McHugh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-03

4.  Context and time in causal learning: contingency and mood dependent effects.

Authors:  Rachel M Msetfi; Caroline Wade; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.