Literature DB >> 14534587

Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation.

Matthew P Walker1, Tiffany Brakefield, J Allan Hobson, Robert Stickgold.   

Abstract

Historically, the term 'memory consolidation' refers to a process whereby a memory becomes increasingly resistant to interference from competing or disrupting factors with the continued passage of time. Recent findings regarding the learning of skilled sensory and motor tasks ('procedural learning') have refined this definition, suggesting that consolidation can be more strictly determined by time spent in specific brain states such as wake, sleep or certain stages of sleep. There is also renewed interest in the possibility that recalling or 'reactivating' a previously consolidated memory renders it once again fragile and susceptible to interference, therefore requiring periods of reconsolidation. Using a motor skill finger-tapping task, here we provide evidence for at least three different stages of human motor memory processing after initial acquisition. We describe the unique contributions of wake and sleep in the development of different forms of consolidation, and show that waking reactivation can turn a previously consolidated memory back into a labile state requiring subsequent reconsolidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534587     DOI: 10.1038/nature01930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  294 in total

Review 1.  Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task.

Authors:  Maxime Trempe; Maxime Sabourin; Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Samuel J Gershman; Sean M Polyn; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

4.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  After-training emotional interference may modulate sequence awareness in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Cigdem Onal-Hartmann; Mirta Fiorio; Reinhard Gentner; Daniel Zeller; Paul Pauli; Joseph Classen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Receptors in (e)motion.

Authors:  Jelena Radulovic; Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Update on memory systems and processes.

Authors:  Lynn Nadel; Oliver Hardt
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 8.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Trauma, treatment and Tetris: video gaming increases hippocampal volume in male patients with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Oisin Butler; Kerstin Herr; Gerd Willmund; Jürgen Gallinat; Simone Kühn; Peter Zimmermann
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

10.  REM sleep rescues learning from interference.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McDevitt; Katherine A Duggan; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.