Literature DB >> 14534333

First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18.

Ronald Wapner1, Elizabeth Thom, Joe Leigh Simpson, Eugene Pergament, Richard Silver, Karen Filkins, Lawrence Platt, Maurice Mahoney, Anthony Johnson, W Allen Hogge, R Douglas Wilson, Patrick Mohide, Douglas Hershey, David Krantz, Julia Zachary, Rosalinde Snijders, Naomi Greene, Rudy Sabbagha, Scott MacGregor, Lyndon Hill, Alain Gagnon, Terrence Hallahan, Laird Jackson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for aneuploid pregnancies is routinely performed after 15 weeks of gestation and has a sensitivity of approximately 65 percent, with a false positive rate of 5 percent. First-trimester markers of aneuploidy have been developed, but their use in combination has not been adequately evaluated in clinical practice.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of screening for trisomies 21 and 18 among patients with pregnancies between 74 and 97 days of gestation, based on maternal age, maternal levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency. A screening result was considered to be positive for trisomy 21 if the calculated risk was at least 1 in 270 pregnancies and positive for trisomy 18 if the risk was at least 1 in 150.
RESULTS: Screening was completed in 8514 patients with singleton pregnancies. This approach to screening identified 85.2 percent of the 61 cases of Down's syndrome (95 percent confidence interval, 73.8 to 93.0), with a false positive rate of 9.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 8.8 to 10.1). At a false positive rate of 5 percent, the detection rate was 78.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 66.3 to 88.1). Screening identified 90.9 percent of the 11 cases of trisomy 18 (95 percent confidence interval, 58.7 to 99.8), with a 2 percent false positive rate. Among women 35 years of age or older, screening identified 89.8 percent of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 15.2 percent, and 100 percent of fetuses with trisomy 18.
CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18 on the basis of maternal age, maternal levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and measurement of fetal nuchal translucency has good sensitivity at an acceptable false positive rate. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534333     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  47 in total

1.  Fetal cardiac function during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Oriana Valenti; Fosca A F Di Prima; Eliana Renda; Marianna Faraci; Entela Hyseni; Roberta De Domenico; Santo Monte; Elsa Giorgio
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell; D Grant Campbell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-07

4.  The assessment of combined first trimester screening in women of advanced maternal age in an Asian cohort.

Authors:  Sarah Weiling Li; Angela Natalie Barrett; Leena Gole; Wei Ching Tan; Arijit Biswas; Hak Koon Tan; Mahesh Choolani
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Socially repugnant or the standard of care: Is there a distinction between sex-selective and ability-selective abortion?

Authors:  Rebecca Lobo; Garnett Genuis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Increased nuchal traslucency in normal karyotype fetuses.

Authors:  Roberta De Domenico; Marianna Faraci; Entela Hyseni; Fosca A F Di Prima; Oriana Valenti; Santo Monte; Elsa Giorgio; Eliana Renda
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  A historical and practical review of first trimester aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Melissa L Russo; Karin J Blakemore
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Advances in medical technology and creation of disparities: the case of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Gérard Bréart; François Goffinet; Béatrice Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Iliac crest angle: a novel sonographic parameter for the prediction of Down syndrome risk during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; L Yeo; S S Hassan; F Gotsch; J P Kusanovic; L F Gonçalves; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 10.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.