Literature DB >> 1453211

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

T M Beck1, P J Hesketh, S Madajewicz, R M Navari, K Pendergrass, E P Lester, J A Kish, W K Murphy, J D Hainsworth, D R Gandara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.
RESULTS: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%).
CONCLUSION: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453211     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Innovative approaches in the treatment of emesis.

Authors:  S M Grunberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  E A Perez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron versus metoclopramide regimens: a hospital perspective from Italy.

Authors:  E Ballatori; F Roila; P Berto; V De Angelis; C Neri; A Olivieri; M Tonato; A Del Favero
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Are there differences among the serotonin antagonists?

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Ondansetron. An update of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Anthony Markham; Eugene M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Granisetron vs ondansetron: is it a question of duration of 5-HT3 receptor blockade?

Authors:  P Blower; M Aapro
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.