Literature DB >> 1453199

Adjuvant therapy with a doxorubicin regimen and long-term tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial.

D C Tormey1, R Gray, M D Abeloff, D L Roseman, K W Gilchrist, E J Barylak, P Stott, G Falkson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized trial was performed in premenopausal postoperative women with ipsilateral axillary node-positive (N+) breast carcinoma and known estrogen receptor (ER) status to assess the efficacy of an Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH)-based induction regimen and 5 or more years of tamoxifen (Tam). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 12 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8, prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, and Tam 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPT), or the same regimen plus halotestin 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPTH) alternating monthly with 22-day cycles of vinblastine 4.5 mg/m2 IV day 1, Adriamycin 45 mg/m2 IV day 1, thiotepa 12 mg/m2 IV day 1, halotestin, and Tam (ALTER). Prednisone in the ALTER regimen was stopped after the second CMFPTH cycle. After 12 cycles, patients were again randomized to stop or continue Tam. After 5 years, patients on Tam were again randomized to continue or stop Tam; the results from this randomization are still coded. Among 533 analyzed induction cases, 263 received CMFPT and 270 ALTER. Among 396 analyzed maintenance cases, 201 continued Tam and 195 were observed. Pretreatment characteristics were balanced among treatments. The median follow-up times are 5.1 years for induction and 4.1 years for maintenance.
RESULTS: The time to relapse (TTR) was superior for the ALTER regimen (P = .04) and for the maintenance Tam (P = .05). Overall survival comparisons between the regimens are not statistically different. A longer TTR was associated with decreasing nodal involvement, ER+ status, and increasing age. The favorable effects of decreasing nodal involvement and ER+ status carried over to survival; a progesterone receptor-positive (PgR+) status and decreasing tumor size were also associated with longer survival. Development of amenorrhea was associated with improved TTR and survival. Toxicity was similar for the two induction regimens and for the two maintenance regimens. Overall relapse patterns were similar among the induction regimens, but continuing Tam led to fewer locoregional relapses.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest significant overall TTR therapeutic benefits of an Adriamycin-containing alternating induction regimen and of continuing maintenance Tam therapy for at least 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453199     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

1.  Tamoxifen plus chemotherapy versus tamoxifen alone as adjuvant therapies for node-positive postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: a stochastic economic evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Jackie Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  What is the ideal duration of adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer: are four cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin enough?

Authors:  L N Shulman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Postoperative endocrine therapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Leisha A Emens; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

4.  Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer--10-year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy.

Authors:  D A Cameron; E D Anderson; P Levack; R A Hawkins; T J Anderson; R C Leonard; A P Forrest; U Chetty
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Survival in patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: little evidence of improvement over the past 30 years.

Authors:  Amye J Tevaarwerk; Robert J Gray; Bryan P Schneider; Mary Lou Smith; Lynne I Wagner; John H Fetting; Nancy Davidson; Lori J Goldstein; Kathy D Miller; Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Third annual William L. McGuire Memorial Lecture. "Studies on the estrogen receptor in breast cancer"--20 years as a target for the treatment and prevention of cancer.

Authors:  V C Jordan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Fourteenth Gaddum Memorial Lecture. A current view of tamoxifen for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  V C Jordan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Less efficacy with alternating regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II node-positive breast cancer: results at 8 years (Pronacam 85).

Authors:  R Chacon; L Romero Acuña; C Blajman; C Galvez; M Bruno; A Romero; G Chiessa; M Bader; R Schwan; C Albera; M T Santarelli; F Sousa Martínez; J Nadal; M Viniegra
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. A single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study).

Authors:  S De Placido; F Perrone; C Carlomagno; A Morabito; C Pagliarulo; R Lauria; A Marinelli; M De Laurentiis; E Varriale; G Petrella
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Estimates of the likely prophylactic effect of tamoxifen in women with high risk BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  S W Duffy; R M Nixon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.