Literature DB >> 14530979

Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling.

Piero Mognoni1, Pietro E di Prampero.   

Abstract

In cycling the gear determines the distance travelled and the mean applied force at each leg thrust. According to Padilla et al. (J Appl Physiol 89:1522-1527, 2000), an elite cyclist was able to cycle for an hour at 14.6 m.s(-1 developing 510 W at a pedal frequency of 101 rpm. Thus, the opposing force was 34 N (=500/14.6), whereas the mean force, developed by the leg muscles, was 144.1 N. It can be calculated that in the same subject cycling on a 20% slope at the same pedal frequency, the velocity would be reduced by about 5 times, i.e. to 2.9 m.s(-1) because of a fivefold increase of the opposing force. In reality, the increase of mean force developed by leg muscles is even larger, because of the fall of the cadence to 60 rpm. In general, during mountain ascents cyclists develop high forces at low cadences that are likely to be more economical; in contrast, on flat ground, they increase the pedalling rates because their aerodynamic posture does not allow high force production. The intermittent pattern of muscular force application generates speed changes that become more evident at great inclines and low cadences. It can be shown that inertial work is appreciable in cycling, increasing with the incline of the road and decreasing with the cadence. However, inertial work does not seem to affect efficiency. Differences in physiologic potential make differences in performance more evident in time trials where the mean incline of the road is not negligible. Cyclists with low body size have an advantageous force versus mass ratio in high mountain ascents.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530979     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0948-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

1.  Body mass scaling of projected frontal area in competitive cyclists.

Authors:  D P Heil
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effect of cadence, cycling experience, and aerobic power on delta efficiency during cycling.

Authors:  A P Marsh; P E Martin; K O Foley
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Cycling on Earth, in space, on the Moon.

Authors:  P E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Determinants of metabolic cost during submaximal cycling.

Authors:  J McDaniel; J L Durstine; G A Hand; J C Martin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-09

5.  Effect of cadence on the economy of uphill cycling.

Authors:  D P Swain; J P Wilcox
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Load and velocity of contraction influence gross and delta mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  L S Sidossis; J F Horowitz; E F Coyle
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  The efficiency of bicycle-pedalling, as affected by speed and load.

Authors:  S Dickinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1929-06-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Bicycle pedalling forces as a function of pedalling rate and power output.

Authors:  R P Patterson; M I Moreno
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Pedal and Crank Kinetics in Uphill Cycling.

Authors:  Graham E Caldwell; Li Li; Steve D McCole; James M Hagberg
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Equation of motion of a cyclist.

Authors:  P E di Prampero; G Cortili; P Mognoni; F Saibene
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1979-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs.

Authors:  Chris Harnish; Deborah King; Tom Swensen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The role of incline, performance level, and gender on the gross mechanical efficiency of roller ski skating.

Authors:  Oyvind Sandbakk; Ann Magdalen Hegge; Gertjan Ettema
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.