Literature DB >> 11560092

Body mass scaling of projected frontal area in competitive cyclists.

D P Heil1.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the scaling relationship between body mass (mb) and projected frontal area (AP) of competitive male cyclists whilst allowing statistically for the influence of bicycle geometry. A group of 21 cyclists [mean mb 74.4 (SD 7.2) kg, mean height 1.82 (SD 0.06) m, mean age 23.6 (SD 5.1) years] volunteered to have AP determined from photographs at three trunk angles (TA: 5 degrees, 15 degrees, 25 degrees) for each of three seat-tube angles (STA: 70 degrees, 75 degrees, 80 degrees) using a modified cycle ergometer. Using multiple log-linear regression analysis procedures, the following equation was developed: Body AP (meters squared) = 0.00433 x (STA0.172) x (TA0.0965) x (mb0.762) (r2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.017 m2) (n = 183 images total). This equation indicates that after allowing for the independent influence of STA and TA on AP, AP was proportional to mb raised to the +0.762 power (i.e. Ap is directly proportional to 0.762). The 95% confidence interval for this exponent (0.670-0.854) barely included the theoretical two-thirds value but not the +0.55 value for AP or the +0.32 value for submaximal metabolic power (Ws) of outdoor cycling reported in the literature. Further analysis of wind tunnel data reported in the literature suggests that the coefficient of drag (CD) is proportional to mb raised to the -0.45 power. When combined with the present study findings, it is suggested that the drag area (CD x AP), which should be proportional to Ws at submaximal cycling velocities, is proportional to mb to the +0.312 power (i.e. CD x AP is directly proportional to mb-0.45) x (mb+0.762) = mb+0.312), which is consistent with the +0.32 exponent for Ws in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11560092     DOI: 10.1007/s004210100424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  8 in total

1.  Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling.

Authors:  Piero Mognoni; Pietro E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Body size as a determinant of the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude.

Authors:  Daniel P Heil
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Scaling maximal oxygen uptake to predict cycling time-trial performance in the field: a non-linear approach.

Authors:  A M Nevill; S A Jobson; G S Palmer; T S Olds
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling.

Authors:  A M Nevill; S A Jobson; R C R Davison; A E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effects of bicycle frame geometry on muscle activation and power during a wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  Mark D Ricard; Patrick Hills-Meyer; Michael G Miller; Timothy J Michael
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  The energetics of cycling on Earth, Moon and Mars.

Authors:  Stefano Lazzer; Luca Plaino; Guglielmo Antonutto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Field-measured drag area is a key correlate of level cycling time trial performance.

Authors:  James E Peterman; Allen C Lim; Ryan I Ignatz; Andrew G Edwards; William C Byrnes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Analysis of Cyclist's Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study.

Authors:  Pedro Forte; Daniel A Marinho; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Tiago M Barbosa; Jorge E Morais
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.