Literature DB >> 14529201

Gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays: an integrative review.

Eyal M Reingold1, Lester C Loschky, George W McConkie, David M Stampe.   

Abstract

Gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays (GCMRDs) center high-resolution information on the user's gaze position, matching the user's area of interest (AOI). Image resolution and details outside the AOI are reduced, lowering the requirements for processing resources and transmission bandwidth in demanding display and imaging applications. This review provides a general framework within which GCMRD research can be integrated, evaluated, and guided. GCMRDs (or "moving windows") are analyzed in terms of (a) the nature of their images (i.e., "multiresolution," "variable resolution," "space variant," or "level of detail"), and (b) the movement of the AOI (i.e., "gaze contingent," "foveated," or "eye slaved"). We also synthesize the known human factors research on GCMRDs and point out important questions for future research and development. Actual or potential applications of this research include flight, medical, and driving simulators; virtual reality; remote piloting and teleoperation; infrared and indirect vision; image transmission and retrieval; telemedicine; video teleconferencing; and artificial vision systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529201     DOI: 10.1518/hfes.45.2.307.27235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  8 in total

1.  Dynamic gaze-position prediction of saccadic eye movements using a Taylor series.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Russell L Woods; Francisco M Costela; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

3.  Implicit processing during change blindness revealed with mouse-contingent and gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Andrey Chetverikov; Maria Kuvaldina; W Joseph MacInnes; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method.

Authors:  Aythami Morales; Francisco M Costela; Russell L Woods
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Ryan V Ringer; Aaron P Johnson; Adam M Larson; Mark Neider; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-14

6.  Eye Tracking Research and Technology: Towards Objective Measurement of Data Quality.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-07

7.  Visual search in naturalistic scenes from foveal to peripheral vision: A comparison between dynamic and static displays.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Teresa Canas-Bajo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  What are the visuo-motor tendencies of omnidirectional scene free-viewing in virtual reality?

Authors:  Erwan Joël David; Pierre Lebranchu; Matthieu Perreira Da Silva; Patrick Le Callet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.