Literature DB >> 1452898

Robustness of the t test applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects.

L M Sullivan1, R B D'Agostino.   

Abstract

In calculus, plaque, and gingivitis trials, measures are taken on subjects both prior to the use of an active treatment and after its use. When the trial is short-term, or when a cleaning of the mouth takes place after the baseline measurement, distributions of such measures (e.g., the Volpe-Manhold score or the Löe and Silness scale) are approximately normally distributed above zero but also can have a proportion of subjects who attain scores of zero. When the effects of an active treatment are compared with those of a control, the two-independent-sample t test can be applied to outcome scores or to differences between the baseline and outcome scores. Robustness of these t tests, in the presence of distributions "distorted" from normality as described, was investigated by computer simulation. In general, both t tests produced actual significance levels which were close to nominal significance levels, even in the presence of small samples and distributions in which as many as 50% of the subjects attained scores of zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1452898     DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710121601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  6 in total

1.  Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.

Authors:  M Roset; X Badia; N E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  PCR quantitation of fetal cells in maternal blood in normal and aneuploid pregnancies.

Authors:  D W Bianchi; J M Williams; L M Sullivan; F W Hanson; K W Klinger; A P Shuber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Student t-tests for potentially abnormal data.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.

Authors:  Justine Rochon; Matthias Gondan; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Statistical conclusion validity: some common threats and simple remedies.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-29

6.  Difficulties in benchmarking ecological null models: an assessment of current methods.

Authors:  Chai Molina; Lewi Stone
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.499

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.