Literature DB >> 14528204

Prognostic factors for recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment by sphincter dilation.

Norio Ueno1, Yoshifumi Ozawa, Toshiyuki Aizawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome for patients after endoscopic sphincter of Oddi dilation is poorly documented. This study investigates the recurrence rate for bile duct stones in patients followed for 1 year or more after endoscopic sphincter dilation and stone extraction, and assessed prognostic factors associated with recurrence of ductal calculi.
METHODS: A total of 169 patients with bile duct stones were treated with endoscopic sphincter dilation between July 1998 and August 2001. Follow-up studies consisted of periodic biochemical tests and out-patient evaluations with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or magnetic resonance cholangiography performed when follow-up exceeded 1 year. Putative risk factors for stone recurrence included gender, age, stone size and number, associated peripapillary diverticulum, gallbladder status, color of bile duct stones, and bile duct diameter. Statistical analysis consisted of both a Kaplan-Meier estimation and a multivariate Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 162 (95.8%) patients, of whom 151 were followed (13 patients died from unrelated disorders). Mean follow-up was 23 months. Stone recurrence was documented in 13 patients. Patients with dilated bile duct or peripapillary diverticulum were at high risk for recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The interval between treatment of bile duct stones by endoscopic sphincter dilation and the recurrence of biliary calculi is relatively short. Bile duct size and peripapillary diverticula are risk factors for early recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528204     DOI: 10.1067/s0016-5107(03)00004-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic papillotomy, syn. sphincterotomy: results from the past two years.

Authors:  Meinhard Classen; Peter Born
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-04

2.  Does the bile duct angulation affect recurrence of choledocholithiasis?

Authors:  Dong Beom Seo; Byoung Wook Bang; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Shin Goo Park; Yong Sun Jeon; Jung Il Lee; Jin-Woo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones reduced late biliary complications: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Takeshi Tsujino; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Hirofumi Kogure; Naminatsu Takahara; Dai Mohri; Saburo Matsubara; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Risk factors for the late development of common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Shin Choi; Jae Hyuk Do; Suk Won Suh; Seung Eun Lee; Hyun Kang; Hyun Jeong Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  D Keizman; M I Shalom; F M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The efficacy of early scheduled follow-up endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jin Nam Kim; Hong Sik Lee; Sung Woo Jung; Ja Seol Koo; Hyung Joon Yim; Sang Woo Lee; Jae Hyun Choi; Chang Duck Kim; Ho Sang Ryu
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of choledocholithiasis: indications, advantages, complications, and long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Joo Won Chung; Jae Bock Chung
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Wen-Hsiung Chang; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Tsang-En Wang; Ming-Jen Chen; Ching-Chung Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Risk factors for recurrence of symptomatic common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Oak; Chang Nyol Paik; Woo Chul Chung; Kang-Moon Lee; Jin Mo Yang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  The clinical significance of bile duct sludge: is it different from bile duct stones?

Authors:  D Keizman; M Ish-Shalom; F M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.