Literature DB >> 14527024

The application of voxel phantoms to the internal dosimetry of radionuclides.

M Zankl1, N Petoussi-Henss, U Fill, D Regulla.   

Abstract

Extensive calculations of specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) for monoenergetic photon sources were performed using a Monte Carlo photon transport code together with seven male and female adult voxel models based on computed tomographic data of real persons. These models offer greater realism with respect to organ topology than the mathematical phantoms commonly used in the past. Due to individual anatomical differences, large variations in photon SAFs between the voxel models were found that can amount to orders of magnitude for very low photon energies. However, in many cases, the larger differences were found between MIRD-type and voxel models, since the inter-organ distances tend to be larger in the MIRD-type phantoms than in reality, due to over-simplification of organ shapes. Furthermore, organ absorbed doses per incorporated activity were evaluated for two selected radiopharmaceuticals. Although a method was found to largely eliminate the influence of organ mass on SAFs for organ self-absorption, the absorbed dose coefficients varied by several tens of per cent between the individual voxel models, thus indicating a significant influence of individual photon SAFs for organ cross-fire on organ absorbed dose. Again, 43% of the MIRD organ dose values were outside the range of doses spanned by the voxel models. Effective dose showed a variation of only up to 26% between the single voxel models for the radiopharmaceuticals considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527024     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of MIRD data for internal dosimetry using the GATE Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  Ali Asghar Parach; Hossein Rajabi; Mohammad Ali Askari
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

3.  KOREAN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT HEAD COMPUTATIONAL PHANTOMS AND APPLICATION TO PHOTON SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS CALCULATIONS.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; Dayton McMillan; Kwang Pyo Kim; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hyung-do Choi; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on I-131 in the thyroid.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  RADAR realistic animal model series for dose assessment.

Authors:  Mary A Keenan; Michael G Stabin; William P Segars; Michael J Fernald
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Dose coefficients for ICRP reference pediatric phantoms exposed to idealised external gamma fields.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Steven L Simon; Timothy J Jorgensen; David A Schauer; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 7.  Voxel-based computational models of real human anatomy: a review.

Authors:  Martin Caon
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  MIDA: A Multimodal Imaging-Based Detailed Anatomical Model of the Human Head and Neck.

Authors:  Maria Ida Iacono; Esra Neufeld; Esther Akinnagbe; Kelsey Bower; Johanna Wolf; Ioannis Vogiatzis Oikonomidis; Deepika Sharma; Bryn Lloyd; Bertram J Wilm; Michael Wyss; Klaas P Pruessmann; Andras Jakab; Nikos Makris; Ethan D Cohen; Niels Kuster; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Correlation between effective dose and radiological risk: general concepts.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Costa; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Denise Yanikian Nersissian; Camila Souza Melo
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.