Literature DB >> 14525735

Comparison of the rapid emergency medicine score and APACHE II in nonsurgical emergency department patients.

Thomas Olsson1, Lars Lind.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To improve the Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in the nonsurgical emergency department (ED) by including age and oxygen saturation, and to compare this new system, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination (APACHE II) with reference to predictive accuracy.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. One hundred sixty-two critically ill patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the period of one year, and 865 nonsurgical patients presenting to an adult emergency department (ED) and admitted to a medical department of a 1200-bed university hospital during two months, were enrolled. For all entries to the ED, RAPS was calculated and developed to include noninvasive peripheral oxygen saturation and patient age (REMS), as well as laboratory tests (APACHE II). These scores were calculated for each patient.
RESULTS: REMS was found to be superior to RAPS in predicting in-hospital mortality both in the critically ill patients admitted to the ICU and in the total sample (area under receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.910 +/- 0.015 for REMS compared with 0.872 +/- 0.022 for RAPS, p < 0.001). An increase of 1 point in the 26-point REMS scale was associated with an odds ratio of 1.40 for in-hospital death (95% confidence interval = 1.36 to 1.45, p < 0.0001). The more advanced APACHE II was not found to be superior to REMS (AUC: 0.901 +/- 0.015, p = 0.218).
CONCLUSIONS: RAPS could be improved as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in the nonsurgical ED by including oxygen saturation and patient age to the system. This new scoring system, REMS, had the same predictive accuracy as the well-established, but more complicated, APACHE II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14525735     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00572.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of mortality among emergency medical admissions.

Authors:  S Goodacre; J Turner; J Nicholl
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center.

Authors:  Erin B Wasserman; Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Jeremy T Cushman; Jeffrey M Caterino; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Suzanne M Gillespie; Julius D Cheng; Ann Dozier
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Validation of physiological scoring systems in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  C P Subbe; A Slater; D Menon; L Gemmell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Comparison of severity of illness scoring systems in the prediction of hospital mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Colleen A Crowe; Erik B Kulstad; Chintan D Mistry; Christine E Kulstad
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-10

5.  Prognostic value of three rapid scoring scales and combined predictors for the assessment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Hai Hu; Weili Kong; Ni Yao; Yanru Qiu; Rong Yao
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 6.  Bench-to-bedside review: outcome predictions for critically ill patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jenny Hargrove; H Bryant Nguyen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Clinical deterioration in older adults with delirium during early hospitalisation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Jean Hsieh; Purnema Madahar; Aluko A Hope; Jennifer Zapata; Michelle N Gong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Intensive care unit scoring systems outperform emergency department scoring systems for mortality prediction in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erika M Moseson; Hanjing Zhuo; Jeff Chu; John C Stein; Michael A Matthay; Kirsten N Kangelaris; Kathleen D Liu; Carolyn S Calfee
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-07-01

9.  Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bryan F Imhoff; Nia J Thompson; Michael A Hastings; Niaman Nazir; Michael Moncure; Chad M Cannon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Performance of physiology scoring systems in prediction of in-hospital mortality of traumatic children: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Gholamreza Faridaalaee; Kavous Shahsavari; Alireza Oraii; Mohammad Javad Hajighanbari; Parviz Karimi; Fatemeh Mahdizadeh; Samaneh Abiri; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.