Literature DB >> 14523743

Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the stroke impact scale.

P W Duncan1, D Wallace, S Studenski, S M Lai, D Johnson.   

Abstract

Current stroke outcome measures are unable to detect some consequences of stroke that affect patients, families, and providers. The objective of this study was to ensure the content validity of a new stroke outcome measure. This was a qualitative study using individual interviews with patients and focus group interviews with patients, caregivers, and health care professionals. Participants included 30 individuals with mild and moderate stroke, 23 caregivers, and 9 stroke experts. Qualitative analysis of the individual and focus group interviews generated a list of potential items. Consensus panels reviewed the potential items, established domains for the measure, developed item scales, and decided on mechanisms for administration and scoring. Although the participants with stroke appeared highly recovered based on scores from conventional stroke assessments (Barthel Index and NIH Stroke Scale), stroke survivors and their caregivers identified numerous persisting impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. In general, stroke survivors described themselves as only about 50% recovered and reported that they had difficulty in activities in which they were not independent. To fully assess the impact of stroke on patients, we used the results of this qualitative study to develop a new stroke-specific outcome, the Stroke Impact Scale.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 14523743     DOI: 10.1310/BRHX-PKTA-0TUJ-UYWT

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  28 in total

1.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ted Stevenson; Leyda Thalman; Heather Christie; William Poluha
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Identification of intrinsic and reflex ankle stiffness components in stroke patients.

Authors:  Laura Galiana; Joyce Fung; Robert Kearney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: implications for task-specific approaches to upper-extremity neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Chavelle B Patterson; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Combining d-cycloserine with motor training does not result in improved general motor learning in neurologically intact people or in people with stroke.

Authors:  Kendra M Cherry; Eric J Lenze; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature.

Authors:  Maggie Lawrence; Sue Kinn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Recovery of thumb and finger extension and its relation to grasp performance after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Stacey L DeJong; Justin A Beebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke.

Authors:  Justin A Beebe; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Measuring stroke impact with SIS: construct validity of SIS telephone administration.

Authors:  Sooyeon Kwon; Pamela Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Sue Min Lai; Dean Reker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke.

Authors:  Justin A Beebe; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.