Maggie Lawrence1, Sue Kinn. 1. Institute for Applied Health Research/School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Involving patients in the determination of their care is increasingly important, and health-care professionals worldwide have recognized a need for clinical outcome measures and interventions that facilitate patient-centred care delivery in a range of settings. AIM: A mixed-methods review was conducted, which aimed to identify stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures and patient-centred interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases searched included MEDLINE and PsycINFO; search strings were based on MeSH terms and keywords associated with the terms 'stroke' and 'patient-centred'. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data; thematic analysis was also performed in the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Three patient-centred outcome measures (Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes, Stroke Impact Scale, Communication Outcome after Stroke scale) and four interventions were identified. Key elements of intervention design included delivery in people's own homes, involvement of families and tailoring to individual needs and priorities. Thematic analysis enabled description of three broad themes: meaningfulness and relevance, quality, and communication, which informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care specific to the specialty of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for health-care professionals to ensure that their practice is relevant to patients and families. The review identified three stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures, key elements of patient-centred interventions, and informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care. These review-derived outputs represent a useful starting point for health-care professionals, whatever their specialty, who are working to reconcile tensions between priorities of health-care professionals and those of patients and their families, to ensure delivery of patient-centred care.
BACKGROUND: Involving patients in the determination of their care is increasingly important, and health-care professionals worldwide have recognized a need for clinical outcome measures and interventions that facilitate patient-centred care delivery in a range of settings. AIM: A mixed-methods review was conducted, which aimed to identify stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures and patient-centred interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases searched included MEDLINE and PsycINFO; search strings were based on MeSH terms and keywords associated with the terms 'stroke' and 'patient-centred'. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data; thematic analysis was also performed in the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Three patient-centred outcome measures (Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes, Stroke Impact Scale, Communication Outcome after Stroke scale) and four interventions were identified. Key elements of intervention design included delivery in people's own homes, involvement of families and tailoring to individual needs and priorities. Thematic analysis enabled description of three broad themes: meaningfulness and relevance, quality, and communication, which informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care specific to the specialty of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for health-care professionals to ensure that their practice is relevant to patients and families. The review identified three stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures, key elements of patient-centred interventions, and informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care. These review-derived outputs represent a useful starting point for health-care professionals, whatever their specialty, who are working to reconcile tensions between priorities of health-care professionals and those of patients and their families, to ensure delivery of patient-centred care.
Authors: Anne Visser-Meily; Marcel Post; Jan Willem Gorter; Steven Berdenis V Berlekom; Trudi Van Den Bos; Eline Lindeman Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2006-12-30 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Annemarie A Uijen; Claire W Heinst; Francois G Schellevis; Wil J H M van den Bosch; Floris A van de Laar; Caroline B Terwee; Henk J Schers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240