Literature DB >> 14521867

Attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: what does it mean for learning and memory?

Martin Sarter1, John P Bruno, Ben Givens.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that cortical cholinergic inputs mediate attentional functions and capacities has been extensively substantiated by experiments assessing the attentional effects of specific cholinotoxic lesions of cortical cholinergic inputs, attentional performance-associated cortical acetylcholine release, and the effects of pharmacological manipulations of the excitability of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic projections on attentional performance. At the same time, numerous animal experiments have suggested that the integrity of cortical cholinergic inputs is not necessary for learning and memory, and a dissociation between the role of the cortical cholinergic input system in attentional functions and in learning and memory has been proposed. We speculate that this dissociation is due, at least in part, to the use of standard animal behavioral tests for the assessment of learning and memory which do not sufficiently tax defined attentional functions. Attentional processes and the allocation of attentional capacities would be expected to influence the efficacy of the acquisition and recall of declarative information and therefore, persistent abnormalities in the regulation of the cortical cholinergic input system may yield escalating impairments in learning and memory. Furthermore, the cognitive effects of loss of cortical cholinergic inputs are augmented by the disruption of the top-down regulation of attentional functions that normally acts to optimize information processing in posterior cortical areas. Because cortical cholinergic inputs play an integral role in the mediation of attentional processing, the activity of cortical cholinergic inputs is hypothesized to also determine the efficacy of learning and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14521867     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7427(03)00070-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  88 in total

1.  Manipulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors differentially affects behavioral inhibition in human subjects with and without disordered baseline impulsivity.

Authors:  Alexandra S Potter; David J Bucci; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Backward masked fearful faces enhance contralateral occipital cortical activity for visual targets within the spotlight of attention.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Karen S Reinke; Pamela J LaMontagne; Reza Habib
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Hippocampal neurotransmitter efflux during one-trial novel object recognition in rats.

Authors:  Emily M Stanley; Marlene A Wilson; Jim R Fadel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Event-related oscillations (ERO) during an active discrimination task: Effects of lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis.

Authors:  Manuel Sanchez-Alavez; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine enhances the release of acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus of the rat.

Authors:  Sunila G Nair; Gary A Gudelsky
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Declarative memory consolidation: mechanisms acting during human sleep.

Authors:  Steffen Gais; Jan Born
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  Where attention falls: Increased risk of falls from the converging impact of cortical cholinergic and midbrain dopamine loss on striatal function.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Roger L Albin; Aaron Kucinski; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Scopolamine impairs auditory delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys.

Authors:  Bethany Plakke; Chi-Wing Ng; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Estrogen therapy and cognition: a review of the cholinergic hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert B Gibbs
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.