Literature DB >> 14520227

Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Anwar H Nassar1, Ihab M Usta, Johnny B Rechdan, Tarek S Harb, Abdallah M Adra, Antoine A Abu-Musa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal complications in spontaneous versus in vitro fertilization twins. STUDY
DESIGN: Twin gestations that were delivered from 1995 to 2000 were reviewed. Cases consisted of 56 in vitro fertilization twins, each of which was matched to two control mothers by age and parity. They were compared regarding various maternal and neonatal complications.
RESULTS: In vitro fertilization twins were more likely to have preterm labor compared with control twins, with no difference in the incidences of pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, or preterm premature rupture of membranes between the two groups. The cesarean delivery rate was significantly higher in cases of twins who were conceived by in vitro fertilization (76.8% vs 58.0%, P=.026), despite a similar rate of elective cesarean delivery and the incidence of nonvertex twin A in both groups. The preterm delivery rate was significantly higher (67.9% vs 41.1%, P=.002) and the gestational age was significantly lower (35+/-3 weeks vs 36+/-3 weeks, P=.043) in cases compared with control subjects. Both twins were, on the average, 230 g lighter in the in vitro fertilization group compared with the control group. However, intrauterine growth restriction was more frequent in the control group (36.6% vs 25%, P=.044). There was a significantly higher incidence of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, respiratory distress syndrome, a need for mechanical ventilation, and pneumothorax in cases compared with control subjects.
CONCLUSION: When compared with spontaneous twins, in vitro fertilization twins are more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery and to have a higher incidence of preterm birth and prematurity-related respiratory complications with a longer nursery stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14520227     DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00485-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Impact of Conception Method on Twin Pregnancy Course and Outcome.

Authors:  S Andrijasevic; J Dotlic; S Aksam; J Micic; M Terzic
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Perinatal death in twins.

Authors:  Philip Steer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-17

4.  Childbirth education for multiple pregnancy: part 1: prenatal considerations.

Authors:  Kristen S Montgomery; Sabrina Cubera; Christie Belcher; David Patrick; Heather Funderburk; Christa Melton; Michelle Fastenau
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2005

5.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies following IVF treatment: a hospital-based comparative study.

Authors:  Cuifang Fan; Yanmei Sun; Jing Yang; Jinping Ye; Suqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-09-15

6.  Neonatal outcomes among multiple births ≤ 32 weeks gestational age: does mode of conception have an impact? A cohort study.

Authors:  Vibhuti Shah; Haydi Alwassia; Karan Shah; Woojin Yoon; Prakeshkumar Shah
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Impacts of different methods of conception on the perinatal outcome of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Chun Feng; Wen-Juan Li; Rong-Huan He; Xi-Wen Sun; Guirong Wang; Li-Quan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julia K Bosdou; Panagiotis Anagnostis; Dimitrios G Goulis; Georgios T Lainas; Basil C Tarlatzis; Grigoris F Grimbizis; Efstratios M Kolibianakis
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Assisted Reproduction is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Congenital Head and Neck Defects.

Authors:  Colin Neumann; Dane A Thompson; Heidi Thorson; James D Sidman; Brianne B Roby
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-07

10.  Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hui Ju Chih; Flavia T S Elias; Laura Gaudet; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.