Literature DB >> 14517711

Does quantitative ultrasound of bone reflect more bone mineral density than bone microarchitecture?

B Cortet1, N Boutry, P Dubois, I Legroux-Gérot, A Cotten, X Marchandise.   

Abstract

Relationships among quantitative ultrasound of bone (QUS), bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture have been poorly investigated in human calcaneus.Twenty-four specimens, from 12 men and 12 women (mean age 78 +/- 10 years; range 53-93), removed from cadavers were studied. The feet were axially sectioned above the ankle. Two variables were measured for QUS (Achilles, Lunar): broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS). A third variable, the stiffness index (SI), which is a combination of both BUA and SOS, was also calculated. BMD (a lateral view) was measured on a QDR 2000 densitometer (Hologic). Bone microarchitecture was assessed by computed tomography (CT) using a conventional CT-system. Fifteen sagittal sections (1 mm in width and 2 mm apart) were selected for CT. Methods used for characterizing bone microarchitecture consisted in structural (trabecular network characterization) and a fractal analyses. The relationships between QUS and bone microarchitecture were assessed by simple linear regression analysis with and without adjustment for BMD (partial correlation) and by backward stepwise regression analysis. Strong relationships were found between BMD and QUS. Adjusted r(2) values were 0.545 for SOS and 0.717 for SI. Two microarchitectural variables were also significantly correlated with both SOS and SI: apparent trabecular separation (App Tr Sp) and trabecular bone pattern factor (App TBPF). After adjustment for BMD few correlations between QUS and microarchitectural variables were always significant. Adjusted squared semipartial coefficients of correlation (rsp2) values between SOS and bone microarchitecture were 6%, 6.8%, 13.2% and 4.6% for App BV/TV, App Tr Sp, App TBPF and fractal dimension (FD), respectively. For SI, corresponding figures were 3.7%, 4.1%, 5.2% and 3.2%. Backward stepwise regression analysis using BMD and microarchitecture showed a slight increase of r(2) values that varied from 8.4% for SI to 17.8% for SOS, compared with BMD alone. The current study suggests that although BMD is a major determinant of acoustic properties of human calcaneus, significant density independent relationships with bone microarchitecture should also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517711     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-2113-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  22 in total

Review 1.  Bone fractal analysis.

Authors:  Gian Pietro Feltrin; Roberto Stramare; Diego Miotto; Dario Giacomini; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Good maintenance of physical benefits in a 12-month exercise and nutritional intervention by voluntary, home-based exercise: a 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhen-Bo Cao; Izumi Tabata; Hidetsugu Nishizono
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  The correlation between calcaneus stiffness index calculated by QUS and total body BMD assessed by DXA in Chinese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Bin Guo; Jian Gong; Hao Xu; Zhiquan Bai
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Serum uric acid is associated with quantitative ultrasound parameters in men: data from the Camargo cohort.

Authors:  J L Hernández; D Nan; J Martínez; E Pariente; I Sierra; J González-Macías; J M Olmos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Older women track and field athletes have enhanced calcaneal stiffness.

Authors:  J M Welch; C J Rosen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A non-invasive prevention program model for the assessment of osteoporosis in the early postmenopausal period: a pilot study on FRAX(®) and QUS tools advantages.

Authors:  P Villa; A P Lassandro; M C Moruzzi; I D Amar; L Vacca; F Di Nardo; C De Waure; A Pontecorvi; G Scambia
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Quantitative ultrasound and fracture risk prediction in non-osteoporotic men and women as defined by WHO criteria.

Authors:  M Y Chan; N D Nguyen; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel: the importance of side in clinical practice.

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Eirini Babaroutsi; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  M Lee; S A Czerwinski; A C Choh; E W Demerath; S S Sun; W C Chumlea; B Towne; R M Siervogel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.