PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in recovery of postural stability, after obtaining similar intravenous sedation levels with midazolam, in elderly and younger patients undergoing dental surgery. METHODS: We studied 15 elderly patients (>65 years) and 15 younger patients (<55 years) after intravenous sedation. Midazolam was carefully titrated over 4-5 min until slow response to verbal commands, ptosis of the eyelid, or slight slurring of speech was obtained. Parameters were postural balance tests and an addition test, as a psychomotor function test. RESULTS: The dose of midazolam in the elderly group (0.045 +/- 0.012 mg.kg(-1)) was 62% of that in the younger group (0.074 +/- 0.026 mg.kg(-1)). In evaluation of the percentile rank of a balance test with a visual feedback system, which contained a dynamic balance element, recovery at 60 min in the elderly group was significantly slower than that in the younger group. However, the recovery times for the balance test and the addition test, at which the significantly changed values were restored to the baseline values, were 120 min and 90 min, respectively, in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the recovery from sedation, elderly patients had more difficulty in acquiring postural adjustment during movement than in maintaining a standing posture. If the dose is carefully administered, however, even elderly patients might be able to return home 2 h after midazolam administration, as could the younger patients.
PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in recovery of postural stability, after obtaining similar intravenous sedation levels with midazolam, in elderly and younger patients undergoing dental surgery. METHODS: We studied 15 elderly patients (>65 years) and 15 younger patients (<55 years) after intravenous sedation. Midazolam was carefully titrated over 4-5 min until slow response to verbal commands, ptosis of the eyelid, or slight slurring of speech was obtained. Parameters were postural balance tests and an addition test, as a psychomotor function test. RESULTS: The dose of midazolam in the elderly group (0.045 +/- 0.012 mg.kg(-1)) was 62% of that in the younger group (0.074 +/- 0.026 mg.kg(-1)). In evaluation of the percentile rank of a balance test with a visual feedback system, which contained a dynamic balance element, recovery at 60 min in the elderly group was significantly slower than that in the younger group. However, the recovery times for the balance test and the addition test, at which the significantly changed values were restored to the baseline values, were 120 min and 90 min, respectively, in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the recovery from sedation, elderly patients had more difficulty in acquiring postural adjustment during movement than in maintaining a standing posture. If the dose is carefully administered, however, even elderly patients might be able to return home 2 h after midazolam administration, as could the younger patients.