Literature DB >> 14516220

Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions.

Ina Bornkessel1, Matthias Schlesewsky, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

The authors demonstrate that intersentential context may influence syntactic integration processes during online sentence comprehension, although this influence appears to be restricted to cases in which a contextual requirement must be fulfilled. By applying event-related brain potentials to the processing of clause-medial word order variations in German, the authors show that the local processing difficulty (a negativity from 300 to 450 ms) observed for object-initial sentences in a neutral context is also obtained in a (behaviorally) facilitating context in which the object is contextually given. By contrast, the processing pattern for a focused (questioned) initial object does not differ from that for a focused subject: both elicit a parietal positivity (280-480 ms) post-onset of the focused phrase. The authors interpret this early positivity as a general marker of focus integration, a process that appears to briefly supersede sentence-internal requirements. (c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516220     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Violations of information structure: an electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions.

Authors:  H W Cowles; Robert Kluender; Marta Kutas; Maria Polinsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Processing of a free word order language: the role of syntax and context.

Authors:  Natalia Slioussar
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-08

3.  Context improves comprehension of fronted objects.

Authors:  Line Burholt Kristensen; Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen; Mads Poulsen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-04

4.  Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.

Authors:  Masatoshi Koizumi; Satoshi Imamura
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

5.  New is not always costly: evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese.

Authors:  Luming Wang; Petra B Schumacher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-28

6.  ERP evidence on the interaction between information structure and emotional salience of words.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Marcel Bastiaansen; Yufang Yang; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  N400 amplitude, latency, and variability reflect temporal integration of beat gesture and pitch accent during language processing.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Nicole Landi; Julia Irwin; James C McPartland
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.610

8.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs.

Authors:  Ulrike Toepel; Ann Pannekamp; Kai Alter
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Electrophysiology Reveals the Neural Dynamics of Naturalistic Auditory Language Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reflect Continuous Model Updates.

Authors:  Phillip M Alday; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.