Literature DB >> 14514533

Anthropometry of young competitive sport rock climbers.

P B Watts1, L M Joubert, A K Lish, J D Mast, B Wilkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adult elite competitive rock climbers are small in stature with low body mass and very low body fat percentage. These characteristics have generated concern that young climbers may attempt body mass reduction to extreme levels with adverse consequences for health and performance. No published anthropometry data for young competitive climbers exist.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the general anthropometric characteristics of junior US competitive rock climbers.
METHODS: Ninety subjects (mean (SD) age 13.5 (3.0) years) volunteered to participate. All competed at the Junior Competition Climbers Association US National Championship. Anthropometric variables, including height, mass, body mass index (BMI), arm span, biiliocristal and biacromial breadths, skinfold thickness at nine anatomical sites, forearm and hand volumes, and handgrip strength, were measured. Selected variables were expressed as ratio values and as normative age and sex matched centile scores where appropriate. A control group (n=45) of non-climbing children and youths who participated in a variety of sports activities, including basketball, cross country running, cross country skiing, soccer, and swimming, underwent the same testing procedures in the Exercise Science Laboratory of Northern Michigan University.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) self reported climbing ability was 11.80 (1.20), or about 5.11 d on the Yosemite decimal system scale. The mean (SD) experience level was 3.2 (1.9) years, and subjects competed in 10 (5) organised competitions over a 12 month period. Despite similarity in age, there were significant differences (p<0.01) between climbers and control subjects for height, mass, centile scores for height and mass, ratio of arm span to height ("ape index"), biiliocristal/biacromial ratio, sum of seven and sum of nine skinfolds, estimated body fat percentage, and handgrip/mass ratio. Despite significantly lower skinfold sums and estimated body fat percentage, no differences were found between climbers and controls for absolute BMI or BMI expressed as a centile score.
CONCLUSIONS: Young competitive climbers have similar general anthropometric characteristics to elite adult climbers. These include relatively small stature, low body mass, low sums of skinfolds, and high handgrip to mass ratio. Relative to age matched athletic non-climbers, climbers appear to be more linear in body type with narrow shoulders relative to hips. Differences in body composition exist between climbers and non-climbing athletes despite similar BMI values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514533      PMCID: PMC1751349          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  13 in total

1.  Metabolic response during sport rock climbing and the effects of active versus passive recovery.

Authors:  P B Watts; M Daggett; P Gallagher; B Wilkins
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION: REVISION OF SOME QUANTITATIVE ASSUMPTIONS.

Authors:  J BROZEK; F GRANDE; J T ANDERSON; A KEYS
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1963-09-26       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; J A Weststrate; J C Seidell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers.

Authors:  S Grant; V Hynes; A Whittaker; T Aitchison
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Acute changes in handgrip strength, endurance, and blood lactate with sustained sport rock climbing.

Authors:  P Watts; V Newbury; J Sulentic
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing.

Authors:  C M Mermier; R A Robergs; S M McMinn; V H Heyward
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth.

Authors:  M H Slaughter; T G Lohman; R A Boileau; C A Horswill; R J Stillman; M D Van Loan; D A Bemben
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Grip strength and endurance in rock climbers.

Authors:  A Cutts; S R Bollen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.617

9.  Anthropometric profiles of elite male and female competitive sport rock climbers.

Authors:  P B Watts; D T Martin; S Durtschi
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Physiological and anthropometric determinants of sport climbing performance.

Authors:  C M Mermier; J M Janot; D L Parker; J G Swan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of difficult rock climbing.

Authors:  Phillip B Watts
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Hormone responses to a continuous bout of rock climbing in men.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Kyle A Sherk; SoJung Kim; Kaelin C Young; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physiological responses to rock climbing in young climbers.

Authors:  Audry Birute Morrison; Volker Rainer Schöffl
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Electrical and mechanical response of finger flexor muscles during voluntary isometric contractions in elite rock-climbers.

Authors:  Fabio Esposito; Eloisa Limonta; Emiliano Cè; Massimiliano Gobbo; Arsenio Veicsteinas; Claudio Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Climbing-specific finger flexor performance and forearm muscle oxygenation in elite male and female sport climbers.

Authors:  Marc Philippe; Daniel Wegst; Tom Müller; Christian Raschner; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Attitudes towards disordered eating in the rock climbing community: a digital ethnography.

Authors:  Mattias Strand
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-07-07

7.  Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers.

Authors:  Vanesa España-Romero; Francisco B Ortega Porcel; Enrique G Artero; David Jiménez-Pavón; Angel Gutiérrez Sainz; Manuel J Castillo Garzón; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Rock Climbing for Promoting Physical Activity in Youth.

Authors:  Shannon R Siegel; Simon M Fryer
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2015-07-22

9.  The effect of hand dimensions, hand shape and some anthropometric characteristics on handgrip strength in male grip athletes and non-athletes.

Authors:  Ali Asghar Fallahi; Ali Akbar Jadidian
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Somatic profile of competitive sport climbers.

Authors:  Paweł Tomaszewski; Jan Gajewski; Joanna Lewandowska
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.