Literature DB >> 14513952

Aerodynamic and acoustical measures of speech, operatic, and Broadway vocal styles in a professional female singer.

R E Stone1, Thomas F Cleveland, P Johan Sundberg, Jan Prokop.   

Abstract

Understanding how the voice is used in different styles of singing is commonly based on intuitive descriptions offered by performers who are proficient in only one style. Such descriptions are debatable, lack reproducibility, and lack scientifically derived explanations of the characteristics. We undertook acoustic and aerodynamic analyses of a female subject with professional experience in both operatic and Broadway styles of singing, who sang examples in these two styles. How representative the examples are of the respective styles was investigated by means of a listening test. Further, as a reference point, we compared the styles with her speech. Variation in styles associated with pitch and vocal loudness was investigated for various parameters: subglottal pressure, closed quotient, glottal leakage, H1-H2 difference (the level difference between the two lowest partials of the source spectrum), and glottal compliance (the ratio between the air volume displaced in a glottal pulse and the subglottal pressure). Formant frequencies, long-term-average spectrum, and vibrato characteristics were also studied. Characteristics of operatic style emerge as distinctly different from Broadway style, the latter being more similar to speaking.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513952     DOI: 10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00074-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  8 in total

1.  Vocal tract resonances in speech, singing, and playing musical instruments.

Authors:  Joe Wolfe; Maëva Garnier; John Smith
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2008-12-03

2.  Modeling source-filter interaction in belting and high-pitched operatic male singing.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Albert S Worley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phonation Demonstrates Goal Dependence Under Unique Vocal Intensity and Aerobic Workload Conditions.

Authors:  Aaron Ziegler; Jessie VanSwearingen; John M Jakicic; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Characteristics of phonatory function in singers and nonsingers with vocal fold nodules.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; James T Heaton; Tara K Stadelman-Cohen; Maia N Braden; Marie E Jetté; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  A Formant Range Profile for Singers.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Lynn M Maxfield; Megan C Walker
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  The Measurement of Airflow Using Singing Helmet That Allows Free Movement of the Jaw.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Rewais B Hanna; Malachi V Willey; Adam Rieves
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Qualitative real-time schlieren and shadowgraph imaging of human exhaled airflows: an aid to aerosol infection control.

Authors:  Julian W Tang; Andre D G Nicolle; Jovan Pantelic; Mingxiu Jiang; Chandra Sekhr; David K W Cheong; Kwok Wai Tham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Linked Dual Representation model of vocal perception and production.

Authors:  Sean Hutchins; Sylvain Moreno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.