Literature DB >> 14513302

Modulation of elbow joint stiffness in a vertical plane during cyclic movement at lower or higher frequencies than natural frequency.

Masaki O Abe1, Norimasa Yamada.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine how joint stiffness during cyclic movement in a vertical plane is modulated at lower or higher frequencies than the natural frequency of the system. Five male subjects were instructed to swing their forearms rhythmically in a vertical plane under various frequency conditions (0.7-2.25 Hz). To estimate the mechanical properties of the elbow joint, external perturbations were applied by an electromagnetic torque motor system to the forearm of each subject during the movement. Joint stiffness showed a significant quadratic trend with a minimum close to the natural frequency of the apparatus-forearm system (1.09+/-0.08 Hz). The resonant frequency showed the similar tendencies to joint stiffness and was significantly different from movement frequency in the lower frequency range (0.7-0.9 Hz). In addition, the ratio of joint stiffness to the background torque (ST(ratio)) was greater in the frequency conditions below the natural frequency than in the frequency conditions above the natural frequency and was relatively constant in the latter. These results suggested that: (1) the modulation of joint stiffness for movement in a vertical plane, by which the resonant frequency of the system is kept close to the movement frequency, may be limited to the movement frequency range above the natural frequency; and (2), in the case of movement in a vertical plane, the mechanism by which joint stiffness is modulated may change according to the relation between natural frequency and movement frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513302     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1583-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal modulation of joint stiffness during multijoint movement.

Authors:  C D Mah
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Resonance Tuning in Rhythmic Arm Movements.

Authors:  N G Hatsopoulos; W H Warren
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement.

Authors:  D J Bennett; J M Hollerbach; Y Xu; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An airjet actuator system for identification of the human arm joint mechanical properties.

Authors:  I W Hunter; J M Hollerbach; D J Bennett
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Predicting the minimal energy costs of human walking.

Authors:  K G Holt; J Hamill; R O Andres
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.

Authors:  E Burdet; R Osu; D W Franklin; T E Milner; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dependence of elbow viscoelastic behavior on speed and loading in voluntary movements.

Authors:  T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Superposition of motor programs--I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man.

Authors:  A G Feldman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement.

Authors:  H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Carrozzo; N A Borghese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Resonance tuning of a neuromechanical system with two negative sensory feedback configurations.

Authors:  Carrie A Williams; Stephen P Deweerth
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Time flies when you are in a groove: using entrainment to mechanical resonance to teach a desired movement distorts the perception of the movement's timing.

Authors:  Daniel K Zondervan; Jaime E Duarte; Justin B Rowe; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Moving the arm at different rates: slow movements are avoided.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Dagmar Sternad; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Optimal workloop energetics of muscle-actuated systems: an impedance matching view.

Authors:  Waleed A Farahat; Hugh M Herr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.