Literature DB >> 14512844

Late frontal brain potentials distinguish true and false recognition.

Rachel E Goldmann1, Alison L Sullivan, Daniel B J Droller, Michael D Rugg, Tim Curran, Philip J Holcomb, Daniel L Schacter, Kirk R Daffner, Andrew E Budson.   

Abstract

Brain potentials associated with true and false recognition were recorded using a paradigm consisting of categorized color photographs. Two ERP components were identified. A parietal component was most positive for both true and false recognition, less positive for rejection of lures, and least positive for rejection of novel items. A later frontal component was more positive for false recognition, rejection of lures, and misses than for true recognition and rejection of novel items. The authors suggest that the parietal component may reflect the extent to which test items engender recollection of the gist representation of the study list, while the late frontal component may reflect the engagement of effortful post-retrieval processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14512844     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200309150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  17 in total

1.  The worth of pictures: using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Aging memory for pictures: using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Jill D Waring; Ellen H Beth; Joshua D McKeever; William P Milberg; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Yoko Ieuji; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff-Eaton; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Parietal contributions to recollection: electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Jon S Simons; Joshua D McKeever; Polly V Peers; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The imagination inflation effect in healthy older adults and patients with mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Maureen K O'Connor; Rebecca G Deason; Erin Reynolds; Michael J Tat; Sean Flannery; Paul R Solomon; Elizabeth A Vassey; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Jolyon Poole; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-12-16

8.  Conceptual fluency at test shifts recognition response bias in Alzheimer's disease: implications for increased false recognition.

Authors:  Carl A Gold; Natalie L Marchant; Wilma Koutstaal; Daniel L Schacter; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.

Authors:  Christina E Webb; Indira C Turney; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  An evaluation of recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Carl A Gold; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.