Literature DB >> 14511534

The effects of gender on the neural substrates of pitch memory.

Nadine Gaab1, Julian Paul Keenan, Gottfried Schlaug.   

Abstract

Imaging studies have indicated that males and females differ anatomically in brain regions thought to underlie language functions. Functional studies have corroborated this difference by showing gender differences in terms of language processing with females relying on less lateralized processing strategies than males. Gender differences in musical functions might show similar differences in functional asymmetries, although no detailed study has been performed. The current study employed a pitch memory task while acquiring functional magnetic resonance images to investigate possible differences in hemispheric processing between males and females. Gender differences were found in the time course of activation (during the first four imaging time points after the end of the auditory stimulus-"perceptual phase"-and the subsequent three imaging time points after the end of the auditory stimulus-"memory phase") in both anterior and posterior perisylvian regions. Male subjects had greater lateralized activations (left > right) in anterior and posterior perisylvian regions during the "perceptual" as well as during the "memory" phase. There was a trend for males to have more cerebellar activation than females. Females showed more prominently posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex activation compared to males. Although activation patterns differed, there was no difference in the behavioral performance between both genders. These data indicate that similar to language studies, males rely more on left lateralized hemispheric processing even for basic pitch tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14511534     DOI: 10.1162/089892903322370735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Differential roles of right temporal cortex and Broca's area in pitch processing: evidence from music and Mandarin.

Authors:  Yun Nan; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Voice perception: Sex, pitch, and the right hemisphere.

Authors:  Sonja Lattner; Martin E Meyer; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modified test statistics by inter-voxel variance shrinkage with an application to f MRI.

Authors:  Shu-Chih Su; Brian Caffo; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Susan Spear Bassett
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Classical music, educational learning, and slow wave sleep: A targeted memory reactivation experiment.

Authors:  Chenlu Gao; Paul Fillmore; Michael K Scullin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 5.  Moderating variables of music training-induced neuroplasticity: a review and discussion.

Authors:  Dawn L Merrett; Isabelle Peretz; Sarah J Wilson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-09

6.  Do women prefer more complex music around ovulation?

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; Piera Filippi; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Influence of the Psychophysical Assessment Paradigm on Pitch Discrimination for Adults (and a Pilot Sample of Children).

Authors:  Ashley G Flagge; Lucile Puranen; Madhuri S Mulekar
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2021-09-02

8.  Perceiving pitch absolutely: comparing absolute and relative pitch possessors in a pitch memory task.

Authors:  Katrin Schulze; Nadine Gaab; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Gender Differences in Cognitive Control: an Extended Investigation of the Stop Signal Task.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; Sheng Zhang; Jeng-Ren Duann; Peisi Yan; Rajita Sinha; Carolyn M Mazure
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Tonotopic organization in the depth of human inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David Ress; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.