BACKGROUND: There has been a renewed interest in ST segment analysis by Holter Monitoring, especially in multicenter clinical trials, but consensus on how to define an ischemic event is missing. We conducted a survey of European and U.S. publications involving ST segment analysis by Holter monitoring from 1975 to 2002 and found no notation of any correction for baseline ST segment depression in 52% of them. In 45% J-point depression was required in addition to ST segment depression measured either 60 ms (24%) or 80 ms (76%) after the J point. In 28% ST segment elevations were included. METHOD: Four different criteria for an ischemic event found in our survey were applied to Holter recordings from 66 patients with acute ischemic syndrome enrolled in the Esmolol Myocardial Ischemia Trial (EMIT). Only lead CM5 was used and the analyzer was a Reynolds Medical Pathfinder 600. RESULTS: By the most sensitive method (J + 80), there were 16 (24%) patients who had ischemic events in their Holter recording compared to only 10 (15%) patients if J-point depression was also required. If corrections were made for baseline ST segment depression, only 3 (4.5%) recordings were positive for ischemia. CONCLUSION: The outcome of Holter analysis for ischemic events is greatly dependent upon how an ischemic event is defined. Consensus on how to define an ischemic event is urgently needed.
BACKGROUND: There has been a renewed interest in ST segment analysis by Holter Monitoring, especially in multicenter clinical trials, but consensus on how to define an ischemic event is missing. We conducted a survey of European and U.S. publications involving ST segment analysis by Holter monitoring from 1975 to 2002 and found no notation of any correction for baseline ST segment depression in 52% of them. In 45% J-point depression was required in addition to ST segment depression measured either 60 ms (24%) or 80 ms (76%) after the J point. In 28% ST segment elevations were included. METHOD: Four different criteria for an ischemic event found in our survey were applied to Holter recordings from 66 patients with acute ischemic syndrome enrolled in the EsmololMyocardial Ischemia Trial (EMIT). Only lead CM5 was used and the analyzer was a Reynolds Medical Pathfinder 600. RESULTS: By the most sensitive method (J + 80), there were 16 (24%) patients who had ischemic events in their Holter recording compared to only 10 (15%) patients if J-point depression was also required. If corrections were made for baseline ST segment depression, only 3 (4.5%) recordings were positive for ischemia. CONCLUSION: The outcome of Holter analysis for ischemic events is greatly dependent upon how an ischemic event is defined. Consensus on how to define an ischemic event is urgently needed.
Authors: S G Goodman; A Barr; A Sobtchouk; M Cohen; G J Fromell; L Laperrière; C Hill; A Langer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Henrik Wiggers; Morten Bøttcher; Henrik Egeblad; Henning Mølgaard; Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen; Hans Erik Bøtker Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: H L Kennedy; S M Seiler; M K Sprague; S M Homan; J A Whitlock; M J Kern; M G Vandormael; H B Barner; J E Codd; V L Willman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1990-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Merete Vaage-Nilsen; Dorte L Nielsen; Anne Dyhl-Polk; Morten Schou; Kirsten K Vistisen; Anne-Sophie Sillesen; Eva Serup-Hansen; Jens Faber; Tobias W Klausen; Stig E Bojesen Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-10-07