Literature DB >> 11079650

Low molecular weight heparin decreases rebound ischemia in unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: the Canadian ESSENCE ST segment monitoring substudy.

S G Goodman1, A Barr, A Sobtchouk, M Cohen, G J Fromell, L Laperrière, C Hill, A Langer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether enoxaparin was more effective than heparin in reducing recurrent ischemic episodes.
BACKGROUND: Continuous ST segment monitoring is a simple tool for assessment of ischemia and identifies patients with a worse prognosis. Little is known about the impact of low molecular weight heparin on ST segment shift.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive enoxaparin or heparin (mean 3.4 days). Three-lead ST segment monitoring was performed for the first 48 h (n = 220) and an additional 48 h (n = 174) after intravenous study drug discontinuation (mean 1.9 days later).
RESULTS: During initial monitoring, ischemia rates were similar among the heparin and enoxaparin groups (27.2% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.44); however, the time to first ischemic episode was earlier among heparin-treated patients (11 +/- 11 vs. 25 +/- 18 min, p = 0.001). After drug discontinuation, ischemic episodes occurred more frequently (44.6% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.009), and the total ischemic duration was greater among heparin patients (18 +/- 39 vs. 5 +/- 12 min/24 h, p = 0.005). Recurrent ischemia occurred more frequently after discontinuation in the heparin (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.043), but not the enoxaparin, group (18.4% vs. 25%, p = 0.33). Regardless of treatment, patients with ischemia were more likely to die or experience (re)infarction at one year (18.4% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: ST segment shift occurs frequently in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction despite antithrombotic therapy and is associated with worse one-year prognosis. Enoxaparin is a more effective antithrombotic treatment than unfractionated heparin and leads to greater prevention of rebound ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079650     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00915-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Per Johanson; Galen S Wagner; Mikael Dellborg; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores?

Authors:  Pedro Carmo; Jorge Ferreira; Carlos Aguiar; António Ferreira; Luís Raposo; Pedro Gonçalves; João Brito; Aniceto Silva
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Comparative effects of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin on vascular endothelial cell tissue factor pathway inhibitor release: a model for assessing intrinsic thromboresistance.

Authors:  YouFu Li; Miguel Rodriquez; Frederick A Spencer; Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  ST segment analysis by Holter Monitoring: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Preben Bjerregaard; Amr El-Shafei; Susan L Kotar; Arthur J Labovitz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Combination of low molecular weight heparins with antiplatelet agents in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an update.

Authors:  Marc Cohen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shailja V Parikh; Ellen C Keeley
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.