Literature DB >> 14509957

[Improved patient repositioning accuracy by integrating an additional jaw fixation into a high precision face mask system in stereotactic radiotherapy of the head].

Eric Lopatta1, Susie-Maria Liesenfeld, Priska Bank, Reinhard Wurm, Robert Günther, Tilo Wiezorek, Thomas G Wendt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For high precision radiotherapy of the neurocranium a precise, reproducible positioning technique is the basic prerequisite. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a modification of the commercially available stereotactical BrainLab-head mask system on accuracy in patient positioning during fractionated radiotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 29 patients were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy of the head. Immobilization was provided by a two layer thermoplastic mask system (BrainLab). 18 of these patients received an additional custom made fixation either of the upper jaw (OKF) or of the mandibula (UKF). The positioning accuracy was assessed by measurements of the shifting of anatomical landmarks in relation to the rigid mask system on biplanar simulator films using a digital imaging system. Before each measurement a fine adjustment of the simulator to an optical ring system was performed. The reference radiographs were done just before CT-planning. During a 2-7 weeks lasting course of radiotherapy displacement measurements in relation to the reference images for all three dimensions (z, y and x) were done once a week. In 29 patients 844 measurements were analyzed.
RESULTS: An additional jaw fixation improves the reproducibility of patient positioning significantly in all three spatial dimensions. The standard deviation in lateral direction (x) was 0.6 mm with jaw fixation vs. 0.7 mm without jaw fixation (p < 0.001); in longitudinal direction (z) (measured in 0 degree radiographs) 0.5 mm vs. 1.3 mm (p < 0.001); in longitudinal direction (measured in 90 degrees radiographs) 0.5 mm vs. 1.5 mm (p < 0.001); in vertical direction (y) 0.6 mm vs. 0.9 mm (p = 0.001). No significant differences in standard deviations were found comparing OKF (n = 14) with UKF (n = 4).
CONCLUSION: A significant improvement in reposition accuracy using an additional, individually formed jaw fixation can be acquired. The variability of positioning can be reduced especially in the z-direction. A further reduction of the safety margin around the target volume--especially in benign tumors--is possible by improved fixation technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14509957     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-003-0941-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  6 in total

1.  Clinical results of a pilot study on stereovision-guided stereotactic radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shidong Li; Lawrence R Kleinberg; Daniele Rigamonti; Moody D Wharam; Abdul Rashid; Juan Jackson; David Djajaputra; Shenjen He; Tunisia Creasey; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12

2.  Relocatable fixation systems in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Accuracy of serial CT scans and patient acceptance in a randomized design.

Authors:  A Theelen; J Martens; G Bosmans; R Houben; J J Jager; I Rutten; P Lambin; A W Minken; B G Baumert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation of recurrent glioblastomas : a beneficial treatment option after high-dose radiotherapy?

Authors:  Emmanouil Fokas; Ulrich Wacker; Markus W Gross; Martin Henzel; Elitsa Encheva; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in the management of primary optic nerve sheath meningiomas.

Authors:  Stefanie Milker-Zabel; Peter Huber; Wolfgang Schlegel; Jürgen Debus; Angelika Zabel-du Bois
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prolonged treatment time deteriorates positioning accuracy for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Wang; Yin-Chun Lin; Ham-Min Tseng; Furen Xiao; Chang-Mu Chen; Wei-Li Cheng; Szu-Huai Lu; Keng-Hsueh Lan; Wan-Yu Chen; Hsiang-Kuang Liang; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion.

Authors:  James L Robar; Brenda G Clark; Jason W Schella; Chang Seon Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.