Literature DB >> 14507848

Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany.

E Dahl1, M Beutel, B Brosig, K-D Hinsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons raises serious moral, legal and social issues. The main concern is based on the assumption that a freely available service for sex selection will distort the natural sex ratio and lead to a severe gender imbalance. However, for a severe gender imbalance to happen, at least two conditions have to be met. First, there must be a significant preference for children of a particular sex, and second, there must be a considerable demand for preconception sex selection. To ascertain whether or not these two conditions are met, we have conducted a survey in Germany.
METHODS: As a representative sample of the German population, 1094 men and women aged 18-45 years were asked about their gender preferences and whether or not they could imagine selecting the sex of their children through flow cytometric separation of X- and Y-bearing sperm followed by intrauterine insemination.
RESULTS: 58% of respondents stated that they do not care about the sex of their offspring. 30% wish to have a family with an equal number of boys and girls. 4% would like to have more boys than girls, 3% more girls than boys, 1% only boys and 1% only girls. For first-borns, however, there is still a preference for boys over girls. While 75.6% claimed to have no gender preference, 14.2% would like their first child to be a boy and 10.1% would like their first child to be a girl. Whereas 6% could imagine taking advantage of preconception sex selection, 92% found this to be out of the question. Even in the hypothetical case that a medication for sex selection were ever to become available, 90% stated that they would not want to use it.
CONCLUSION: Given that a majority does not seem to care about the sex of their offspring and only a minority seem to be willing to select the sex of their children, a freely available service for preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons is rather unlikely to cause a severe gender imbalance in Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14507848     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  Building healthy families.

Authors:  Caroline Hadley
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Knowing the fetal gender and its relationship to seeking prenatal care: results from Jordan.

Authors:  Nemeh Ahmad Al-Akour
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-11

4.  Parents mention sons more often than daughters on social media.

Authors:  Elizaveta Sivak; Ivan Smirnov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gendering family composition: sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Gunnar Andersson; Karsten Hank; Marit Rønsen; Andres Vikat
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2006-05

Review 6.  Sex selection: some ethical and policy considerations.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06

7.  The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005-2011).

Authors:  Nirit Pessach; Saralee Glasser; Varda Soskolne; Amihai Barash; Liat Lerner-Geva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-10-28

8.  The effect of religious background on the attitude towards sex selection.

Authors:  Anastasia A Salame; Jospeh Nassif; Ghina S Ghazeeri; Elie M Moubarak; Antoine Hannoun; Antoine A Abu Musa
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Kippen; Edith Gray; Ann Evans
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.