V Vernaeve1, M Bonduelle, H Tournaye, M Camus, A Van Steirteghem, P Devroey. 1. Centre For Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium. valerie.vernaeve@az.vub.ac.be
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Registries on outcome of ICSI pregnancies obtained with testicular sperm do not differentiate between obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We evaluated the pregnancy outcome and neonatal data on children born after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with histologically proven OA or NOA. METHODS: Pregnancies obtained after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with defined NOA (n = 70) were compared with those of men with OA (n = 204). RESULTS: Multiple birth rates in NOA and OA couples, respectively, were 21 versus 27% (P = NS), overall preterm delivery rates were 38 versus 26% (NS), and prematurity rates were 24 versus 13% for singletons (NS) and 86 versus 54% for twins (relative risk 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.42). Median gestational age for singletons was 38.3 versus 39.3 weeks, respectively (P < 0.05). The low birth weight rates were 34 versus 31%, respectively (NS). The early perinatal mortality rate was 66 versus 15 per 1000 births, respectively, (NS). Major congenital malformations were observed in 4 versus 3%, respectively, of the live born babies (NS). Prenatal karyotypes showed 7% de-novo abnormalities in the NOA group versus 1% in the OA group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not show differences between NOA and OA pregnancies except for a strong tendency towards a lower gestational age in singletons and a higher percentage of premature twins in the NOA group. Although our data are based on a limited sample, the differences observed call for further analysis. Given the low pregnancy rates after ICSI with NOA, a multicentre study, differentiating NOA and OA patients, would be recommended.
BACKGROUND: Registries on outcome of ICSI pregnancies obtained with testicular sperm do not differentiate between obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We evaluated the pregnancy outcome and neonatal data on children born after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with histologically proven OA or NOA. METHODS: Pregnancies obtained after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with defined NOA (n = 70) were compared with those of men with OA (n = 204). RESULTS: Multiple birth rates in NOA and OA couples, respectively, were 21 versus 27% (P = NS), overall preterm delivery rates were 38 versus 26% (NS), and prematurity rates were 24 versus 13% for singletons (NS) and 86 versus 54% for twins (relative risk 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.42). Median gestational age for singletons was 38.3 versus 39.3 weeks, respectively (P < 0.05). The low birth weight rates were 34 versus 31%, respectively (NS). The early perinatal mortality rate was 66 versus 15 per 1000 births, respectively, (NS). Major congenital malformations were observed in 4 versus 3%, respectively, of the live born babies (NS). Prenatal karyotypes showed 7% de-novo abnormalities in the NOA group versus 1% in the OA group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not show differences between NOA and OA pregnancies except for a strong tendency towards a lower gestational age in singletons and a higher percentage of premature twins in the NOA group. Although our data are based on a limited sample, the differences observed call for further analysis. Given the low pregnancy rates after ICSI with NOA, a multicentre study, differentiating NOA and OA patients, would be recommended.