Literature DB >> 14505903

Comparison of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine and a non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in non-elderly adults.

Sharon Frey1, Gregory Poland, Sandra Percell, Audino Podda.   

Abstract

The adjuvanted influenza vaccine FLUAD is composed of subunit influenza antigens combined with the MF59-adjuvant emulsion. The vaccine was developed primarily for use in elderly populations, but non-elderly individuals might also benefit. To evaluate this hypothesis, 301 healthy adults were assigned randomly to receive two intramuscular injections of either FLUAD (150 subjects) or a non-adjuvanted vaccine, Fluzone (151 subjects), in two trials conducted at a 1-year interval. Injections consisted of 15 micrograms per 0.5 ml dose. Vaccine composition was A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1), A/Johannesburg/33/94 (H3N2), and B/Harbin/7/94 for the first injection and A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1), A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2), and B/Harbin/7/94 for the second injection. Immunogenicity was evaluated at 28 and 180 days post-immunization. FLUAD was generally well tolerated in healthy adults when compared with Fluzone. FLUAD was associated with increased pain at the injection site after immunization. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of injection-site warmth, chills, myalgia, and analgesic/antipyretic use occurred in the FLUAD group after the first injection but not after the second injection. In both groups, most of these local and systemic reactions were classified as mild. FLUAD was more immunogenic than Fluzone following both injections. After the first injection, statistically significant differences were found in the percentage of subjects with four-fold rises in hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titers at 28 days post-immunization for the B antigen. After the second injection, the FLUAD group had significantly higher HI titers, a significantly higher percentage with a four-fold increase in titer, and a significantly greater percentage of subjects with titers >/=160 for the H3N2 antigen at 28 days. Only minor immunogenicity differences between the two groups were seen at 180 days. Compared with Fluzone, FLUAD was associated with increased immunogenicity and mild post-immunization reactions in healthy adults. The magnitude of increased immunogenicity in healthy adults was less than that seen in elderly populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14505903     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00456-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effect of vaccine administration modality on immunogenicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Wei Wang; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Immunogenicity, safety and consistency of new trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine.

Authors:  H Keipp Talbot; Wendy Keitel; Thomas R Cate; John Treanor; James Campbell; Rebecca C Brady; Irene Graham; Cornelia L Dekker; Dora Ho; Patricia Winokur; Emmanuel Walter; Jillian Bennet; Neil Formica; Gunter Hartel; Maryanne Skeljo; Kathryn M Edwards
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Cross-protection against drifted influenza viruses: options offered by adjuvanted and intradermal vaccines.

Authors:  Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Daniela de Florentiis; Antonella Ceravolo; Valentina Parodi; Paola Canepa; Martina Coppelli; Giancarlo Icardi; Paolo Durando
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A dose-ranging study in older adults to compare the safety and immunogenicity profiles of MF59®-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines following intradermal and intramuscular administration.

Authors:  Giovanni Della Cioppa; Uwe Nicolay; Kelly Lindert; Geert Leroux-Roels; Frédéric Clement; Flora Castellino; Cristina Galli; Nicola Groth; Yotam Levin; Giuseppe Del Giudice
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  CD4 T cell defects in the aged: causes, consequences and strategies to circumvent.

Authors:  Wenliang Zhang; Vinayak Brahmakshatriya; Susan L Swain
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.032

7.  Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin spikes local inflammation that induces Th2 cell and T follicular helper cell responses to the coadministered antigen.

Authors:  Motoyasu Onishi; Koji Ozasa; Kouji Kobiyama; Keiichi Ohata; Mitsutaka Kitano; Keiichi Taniguchi; Tomoyuki Homma; Masanori Kobayashi; Akihiko Sato; Yuko Katakai; Yasuhiro Yasutomi; Edward Wijaya; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Noriyuki Nakatsu; Wataru Ise; Takeshi Inoue; Hiroshi Yamada; Alexis Vandenbon; Daron M Standley; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Cevayir Coban; Taiki Aoshi; Etsushi Kuroda; Ken J Ishii
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Assessment of squalene adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines against pandemic H1N1 influenza in children 6 months to 17 years of age.

Authors:  Timo Vesikari; Stéphanie Pepin; Inca Kusters; Agnès Hoffenbach; Martine Denis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Influenza vaccines.

Authors:  A H Ellebedy; R J Webby
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults.

Authors:  P Durando; D Fenoglio; A Boschini; F Ansaldi; G Icardi; L Sticchi; A Renzoni; P Fabbri; A Ferrera; A Parodi; B Bruzzone; G Gabutti; A Podda; G Del Giudice; E Fragapane; F Indiveri; P Crovari; R Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.