Literature DB >> 24732325

A dose-ranging study in older adults to compare the safety and immunogenicity profiles of MF59®-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines following intradermal and intramuscular administration.

Giovanni Della Cioppa1, Uwe Nicolay1, Kelly Lindert1, Geert Leroux-Roels2, Frédéric Clement2, Flora Castellino1, Cristina Galli1, Nicola Groth1, Yotam Levin3, Giuseppe Del Giudice1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Strategies to optimize responses to seasonal influenza vaccination in older adults include the use of adjuvants, higher antigen doses, and intradermal delivery. In this study adults aged ≥65 years (n = 450) received a single dose of 1 of 2 non-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) formulations administered intradermally (ID), both containing 6 µg of A/H1N1 and B, differing in A/H3N2 content (6 µg or 12 µg), or a single dose of 1 of 8 TIV formulations administered intramuscularly (IM) all containing 15 µg of A/H1N1 and B, differing in A/H3N2 hemagglutinin (HA) content (15 µg or 30 µg) and/or in MF59(®) adjuvant content (0%, 25%, 50%, or 100% of the standard dose). This paper focuses on the comparisons of low-dose non-adjuvanted ID, full-dose non-adjuvanted IM and full-dose MF59-adjuvanted IM formulations (n = 270). At day 22 post-vaccination, at least one European licensure immunogenicity criterion was met by all groups against all 3 strains; however, all three criteria were met against all 3 vaccine strains by the low-dose non-adjuvanted ID and the full-dose MF59-adjuvanted IM groups only. The full-dose MF59-adjuvanted IM group elicited significantly higher immune response vs. the low-dose non-adjuvanted ID formulations for most comparisons. The full-dose MF59 adjuvanted IM groups were associated with increased pain at the site of injection (P<0.01) compared to the ID groups, and the low-dose non-adjuvanted ID groups were associated with increased erythema, induration, and swelling at the injection site (P<0.0001) and unsolicited AEs compared with the IM groups. There were no differences between IM and ID groups in the frequencies of subjects experiencing solicited systemic reactions. Overall, while MF59 adjuvantation increased pain at the site of injection, and intradermal delivery increased unsolicited adverse events, erythema, induration, and swelling at the injection site, both strategies of vaccination strongly enhanced the immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccine in older adults compared with conventional non-adjuvanted intramuscular delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00848848.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MF59; adjuvant; influenza; intradermal; seasonal; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732325      PMCID: PMC5396251          DOI: 10.4161/hv.28618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  39 in total

1.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antibody response after dose sparing intradermal 2009 H1N1 vaccination.

Authors:  Ivan F N Hung; Yotam Levin; Kelvin K W To
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Superior immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccines containing full dose of MF59 (®) adjuvant: results from a dose-finding clinical trial in older adults.

Authors:  Giovanni Della Cioppa; Uwe Nicolay; Kelly Lindert; Geert Leroux-Roels; Frederic Clement; Flora Castellino; Grazia Galli; Nicola Groth; Giuseppe Del Giudice
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 MF59-adjuvanted vaccine in patients with β-thalassemia major.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Emanuela D'Angelo; Cristina Daleno; Francesco Peia; Alessia Scala; Domenico Serra; Nadia Mirra; Carlotta Galeone; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Dose sparing with intradermal injection of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Richard T Kenney; Sarah A Frech; Larry R Muenz; Christina P Villar; Gregory M Glenn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Antibody induction by virosomal, MF59-adjuvanted, or conventional influenza vaccines in the elderly.

Authors:  Iris de Bruijn; Ingo Meyer; Lisya Gerez; Jos Nauta; Katinka Giezeman; Bram Palache
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Safety and immunogenicity of a high dosage trivalent influenza vaccine among elderly subjects.

Authors:  Robert B Couch; Patricia Winokur; Rebecca Brady; Robert Belshe; Wilbur H Chen; Thomas R Cate; Bryndis Sigurdardottir; Amy Hoeper; Irene L Graham; Robert Edelman; Fenhua He; Diane Nino; Jose Capellan; Frederick L Ruben
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Intradermal influenza vaccine administered using a new microinjection system produces superior immunogenicity in elderly adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Holland; Robert Booy; Ferdinandus De Looze; Peter Eizenberg; James McDonald; Jeff Karrasch; Maureen McKeirnan; Hatem Salem; Graham Mills; Jim Reid; Françoise Weber; Melanie Saville
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by intradermal microinjection: A randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial in adults.

Authors:  Isabel Leroux-Roels; Eva Vets; Ralf Freese; Michael Seiberling; Françoise Weber; Camille Salamand; Geert Leroux-Roels
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  The mechanism of action of MF59 - an innately attractive adjuvant formulation.

Authors:  D T O'Hagan; G S Ott; E De Gregorio; A Seubert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Understanding the immune response to seasonal influenza vaccination in older adults: a systems biology approach.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Lambert; Inna G Ovsyannikova; V Shane Pankratz; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.217

View more
  12 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Safety of Intradermal Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Claudia Pileggi; Valentina Mascaro; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Yotam Levin; Efrat Kochba; Ivan Hung; Richard Kenney
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparative Immunogenicity of Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany W Y Ng; Benjamin J Cowling; Hui Zhi Gao; Mark G Thompson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison of immunogenicity between intradermal and intramuscular injections of repeated annual identical influenza virus strains post-pandemic (2011-2012) in COPD patients.

Authors:  Benjamas Chuaychoo; Uraiwan Kositanont; Parichat Niyomthong; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Sorachai Srisuma; Kanokwan Rattanasaengloet; Walaiporn Wongsrisakunkaew; Julalux Thongam; Thaweesak Songserm
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Skin Vaccination against Rotavirus Using Microneedles: Proof of Concept in Gnotobiotic Piglets.

Authors:  Yuhuan Wang; Anastasia Vlasova; Daniel E Velasquez; Linda J Saif; Sukumar Kandasamy; Efrat Kochba; Yotam Levin; Baoming Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Immunogenicity and Safety of Reduced-Dose Intradermal vs Intramuscular Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oluwaseun Egunsola; Fiona Clement; John Taplin; Liza Mastikhina; Joyce W Li; Diane L Lorenzetti; Laura E Dowsett; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 8.  Microarray patches enable the development of skin-targeted vaccines against COVID-19.

Authors:  Emrullah Korkmaz; Stephen C Balmert; Tina L Sumpter; Cara Donahue Carey; Geza Erdos; Louis D Falo
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 9.  Fractional dose of intradermal compared to intramuscular and subcutaneous vaccination - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenny L Schnyder; Cornelis A De Pijper; Hannah M Garcia Garrido; Joost G Daams; Abraham Goorhuis; Cornelis Stijnis; Frieder Schaumburg; Martin P Grobusch
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 6.211

Review 10.  An Overview of Nanocarrier-Based Adjuvants for Vaccine Delivery.

Authors:  Kailash C Petkar; Suyash M Patil; Sandip S Chavhan; Kan Kaneko; Krutika K Sawant; Nitesh K Kunda; Imran Y Saleem
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.