Literature DB >> 14503863

Direct observation of protein-ligand interaction kinetics.

Tanja Mittag1, Brian Schaffhausen, Ulrich L Günther.   

Abstract

Internal dynamics on the micro- to millisecond time scale have a strong influence on the affinity and specificity with which a protein binds ligands. This time scale is accessible through relaxation dispersion measurements using NMR. By studying the dynamics of a protein with different concentrations of a ligand, one can determine the dynamic effects induced by the ligand. Here we have studied slow internal dynamics of the N-terminal src homology 2 domain of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase to probe the role of individual residues for the interaction with a tyrosine-phosphorylated binding sequence from polyoma middle T antigen. While slow dynamic motion was restricted to a few residues in the free SH2 and in the SH2 complex, motion was significantly enhanced by adding even small amounts of ligand. Kinetic rates induced by ligand binding varied between 300 and 2000 s(-1). High rates reflected direct interactions with the ligand or rearrangements caused by ligand binding. Large differences in rates were observed for residues adjacent in the primary sequence reflecting their individual roles in ligand interaction. However, rates were similar for residues involved in the same side chain interactions, reflecting concerted motions during ligand binding. For a subset of residues, exchange must involve structural intermediates which play a crucial role in high-affinity ligand binding. This analysis supports a new view of the dynamics of individual sites of a protein during ligand interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14503863     DOI: 10.1021/bi0347499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  Siderocalin Q83 exhibits differential slow dynamics upon ligand binding.

Authors:  Nicolas Coudevylle; Leonhard Geist; Matthias Hoetzinger; Martin Tollinger; Robert Konrat
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 2.  Solution NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Enzyme Allostery.

Authors:  George P Lisi; J Patrick Loria
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Backbone dynamics in an intramolecular prolylpeptide-SH3 complex from the diphtheria toxin repressor, DtxR.

Authors:  Nilakshee Bhattacharya; Myunggi Yi; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Timothy M Logan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  NMR line shapes and multi-state binding equilibria.

Authors:  Evgenii L Kovrigin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  NMR spectroscopy brings invisible protein states into focus.

Authors:  Andrew J Baldwin; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  NMR line shape analysis of a multi-state ligand binding mechanism in chitosanase.

Authors:  Shoko Shinya; Mariana G Ghinet; Ryszard Brzezinski; Kyoko Furuita; Chojiro Kojima; Sneha Shah; Evgenii L Kovrigin; Tamo Fukamizo
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 7.  Dynamic Protein Interaction Networks and New Structural Paradigms in Signaling.

Authors:  Veronika Csizmok; Ariele Viacava Follis; Richard W Kriwacki; Julie D Forman-Kay
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  NMR and computational methods for molecular resolution of allosteric pathways in enzyme complexes.

Authors:  Kyle W East; Erin Skeens; Jennifer Y Cui; Helen B Belato; Brandon Mitchell; Rohaine Hsu; Victor S Batista; Giulia Palermo; George P Lisi
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-12-14

Review 9.  Using NMR spectroscopy to elucidate the role of molecular motions in enzyme function.

Authors:  George P Lisi; J Patrick Loria
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 9.795

10.  Anesthetic modulation of protein dynamics: insight from an NMR study.

Authors:  Christian G Canlas; Tanxing Cui; Ling Li; Yan Xu; Pei Tang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.