Literature DB >> 14502966

The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option.

Rosaline S Barbour1.   

Abstract

Qualitative research is no longer the "poor relation" to quantitative research that it has been in the past. However, it is important to monitor the manner in which it is becoming incorporated into the mainstream. In this article, the author examines current dangers and challenges by critically reviewing current developments affecting our own research practice. It is argued that technical essentialism (including the co-option of grounded theory) characterizes many responses to qualitative research. The author concludes by suggesting that our own everyday research practice, involving teaching and supervision, provides an opportunity to advance debates about rigor by allowing us to formulate a considered response that respects both the complexities and the unique contribution that qualitative research can make.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14502966     DOI: 10.1177/1049732303253331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  18 in total

1.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Jessica L Johnson; Donna Adkins; Sheila Chauvin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  "Done more for me in a fortnight than anybody done in all me life." How welfare rights advice can help people with cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Moffatt; Emma Noble; Catherine Exley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  "I feel so stupid because I can't give a proper answer…" How older adults describe chronic pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Amanda Clarke; Geraldine Anthony; Denise Gray; Derek Jones; Paul McNamee; Patricia Schofield; Blair H Smith; Denis Martin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Isabel Rubie; Catherine Haighton; James O'Hara; Nikki Rousseau; Nick Steen; Deborah D Stocken; Frank Sullivan; Luke Vale; Scott Wilkes; Janet Wilson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Multicentre individual randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent risky drinking in young people aged 14-15 in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH): study protocol.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Simon Coulton; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Denise Howel; Eileen Kaner; Elaine McColl; Ruth McGovern; Stephanie Scott; Elaine Stamp; Harry Sumnall; Les Tate; Liz Todd; Luke Vale; Viviana Albani; Sadie Boniface; Jennifer Ferguson; Jo Frankham; Eilish Gilvarry; Nadine Hendrie; Nicola Howe; Grant J McGeechan; Grant Stanley; Dorothy Newbury-Birch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Lost in hospital: a qualitative interview study that explores the perceptions of NHS inpatients who spent time on clinically inappropriate hospital wards.

Authors:  Lucy Goulding; Joy Adamson; Ian Watt; John Wright
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Wendy C Birmingham; Neeraj Agarwal; Wendy Kohlmann; Lisa G Aspinwall; Mary Wang; Jay Bishoff; Christopher Dechet; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research - what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618].

Authors:  Suzanne Moffatt; Martin White; Joan Mackintosh; Denise Howel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.