Literature DB >> 14502960

Methodological issues in the use of published cartoons as data.

Ellen Giarelli1, Lorraine Tulman.   

Abstract

When common understanding of a phenomenon is under investigation, mass media representation in general, and cartoon images in particular, are a useful source of data. Sample selection, data collection, and the analysis of constructed images differ from other kinds of data. Cartoonists may intend to stimulate multiple interpretations among readers. Uncovering these interpretations is essential to understanding public discourse of the phenomenon of interest. Semantic validation is used to assess the degree to which the meanings of text relative to their context are accurately represented. Analysis of the image and text of cartoons has the potential to yield important understanding of public discourse surrounding issues of the public's health and well-being.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14502960     DOI: 10.1177/1049732303253545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  16 in total

1.  Boundary issues and multiple relationships in genetic counseling supervision: supervisor, non-supervisor, and student perspectives.

Authors:  Lidan Gu; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sonja Eubanks; Bonnie S LeRoy; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  What do genetic counselors learn on the job? A qualitative assessment of professional development outcomes.

Authors:  Marie Runyon; Kimberly W Zahm; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M Macfarlane; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An investigation of relationships among genetic counselors' supervision skills and multicultural counseling competence.

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Lee; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  "If It Helps, It's Worth a Try": an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian MacFarlane; Rachel Riesgraf; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling supervisor competencies: results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  Sonja Eubanks Higgins; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; L DiAnne Borders; Bonnie LeRoy; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Gay, lesbian, and bisexual patients' recommendations for genetic counselors: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Erin VandenLangenberg; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy; Heather Dean Glessner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  "What would you do if you were me?" Effects of counselor self-disclosure versus non-disclosure in a hypothetical genetic counseling session.

Authors:  Amy L Paine; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Brittany Thomas; Mary Ahrens; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Are genetic counselors and GLBT patients "on the same page"? An investigation of attitudes, practices, and genetic counseling experiences.

Authors:  Heather Dean Glessner; Erin VandenLangenberg; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Seekers, Finders, Settlers, and Stumblers: Identifying the Career Paths of Males in the Genetic Counseling Profession.

Authors:  Anthony Chen; Pat McCarthy Veach; Cheri Schoonveld; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The psychic costs of empathic engagement: personal and demographic predictors of genetic counselor compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Sharanya Udipi; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Juihsien Kao; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.