Literature DB >> 14501455

Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.

Geert De Ceulaer1, Susan Johnson, Marjan Yperman, Kristin Daemers, Frans E Offeciers, Gerald M O'Donoghue, Paul J Govaerts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in patients with cochlear implants. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study was carried out comparing the impedances of cochlear implant electrodes with and without a single application of steroids in the cochlea. PATIENTS: Ninety two implanted children with an average age of 5 years (range, 0.7 to 16 years) were divided in four groups according to the type of electrode and the use of steroids or not. In addition, the impedances of five children who required a reimplantation are reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The impedances of Nucleus electrodes, either straight or Contour, were measured at regular intervals up to 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Two months after surgery, the impedances in the steroid groups were significantly lower than in the nonsteroid groups (straight electrodes, 3.9 versus 4.7 kOhm, respectively; Contour electrodes, 5.4 versus 6.5 kOhm, respectively). This reduction remained stable over time for the straight electrodes, but for the Contour electrodes, it seemed to disappear after 6 months. The impedances after a second implantation were significantly higher than after a first implantation (median value, 8.8 kOhm after 2 months).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of a single dose of a steroid solution reduces the electrode impedances significantly, and, for the straight electrodes, this effect seems to last. It seems justified to reimplant with caution, because this seems to increase the impedances substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501455     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200309000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study of a dexamethasone-releasing silicone for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ya Liu; Claude Jolly; Susanne Braun; Thomas Stark; Elias Scherer; Stefan K Plontke; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Simulation of application strategies for local drug delivery to the inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke; Alec N Salt
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  Systemic immunity influences hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Melanie Souter; Hayden Eastwood; Paul Marovic; Gordana Kel; Sarin Wongprasartsuk; Allen F Ryan; Stephen John O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Minna Wennström; Antti Lehtimäki; Heikki Löppönen; Hannu Valtonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Nanoscale neuroelectrode modification via sub-20 nm silicon nanowires through self-assembly of block copolymers.

Authors:  Parvaneh Mokarian-Tabari; Catalina Vallejo-Giraldo; Marc Fernandez-Yague; Cian Cummins; Michael A Morris; Manus J P Biggs
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic principles in the inner ear: Influence of drug properties on intratympanic applications.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Inner ear drug delivery for auditory applications.

Authors:  Erin E Leary Swan; Mark J Mescher; William F Sewell; Sarah L Tao; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Biomaterials in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Timo Stöver; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

10.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.