Literature DB >> 14500059

A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods.

Linda Brubaker1, Geoff Cundiff, Paul Fine, Ingrid Nygaard, Holly Richter, Anthony Visco, Halina Zyczynski, Morton B Brown, Anne Weber.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a standardized modified Burch colposuspension, when added to planned abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, improves the rate of urinary stress continence in subjects without preoperative symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. Secondary aims include comparison of immediate and short-term complications, overall urinary tract function, and other aspects of pelvic health between subjects with and without a concomitant Burch. The value of preoperative urodynamic testing with prolapse reduction will also be compared between subjects with and without a concomitant Burch. This trial is performed through the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Subjects will be enrolled at seven clinical centers across the United States and data will be analyzed by the central data coordinating center. Standardized questionnaires and physical observations and measurements will be obtained. The surgical team is masked to the preoperative urodynamic findings, and the patient and research coordinator are masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome will be determined at 3 months after surgery. Stress continence is defined as absence of stress incontinence symptoms by questionnaire, a negative standardized stress test, and no treatment for stress incontinence other than the study intervention. Additional follow-up occurs at 6, 12, and 24 months. Accrual began in April 2002 and is projected to take 3 years. As of March 6, 2003, 91 patients have been randomized. This article highlights the scientific aspects of trial design for this pivotal clinical trial. The optimal approach to the urinary tract in women treated surgically for prolapse is not known. This trial is designed to provide pelvic surgeons and their patients with scientific data regarding the utility of urodynamics with and without prolapse reduction and the role of colposuspension with sacrocolpopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14500059     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00073-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  28 in total

1.  Physical activity in women planning sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Vicki Handa; Linda Brubaker; Diane Borello-France; John Wei; Ellen Wells; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-05-11

2.  Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Halina M Zyczynski; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Nancy K Janz; Holly E Richter; Patricia A Wren; Morton B Brown; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Catherine S Bradley; Morton B Brown; Linda Brubaker; Robert E Gutman; R Edward Varner; Anthony G Visco; Anne M Weber; H Zyczynski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  [Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

6.  A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Kevin Chagin; Linda Brubaker; Rebecca G Rogers; Holly E Richter; Lily Arya; Matthew D Barber; Jonathan P Shepherd; Tracy L Nolen; Peggy Norton; Vivian Sung; Shawn Menefee; Nazema Siddiqui; Susan F Meikle; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Should prophylactic anti-incontinence procedures be performed at the time of prolapse repair? Systematic review.

Authors:  Priscila Katsumi Matsuoka; Aparecida Maria Pacetta; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jorge Milhem Haddad
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Changes in physical activity after abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Victoria L Handa; Linda Brubaker; Diane Borello-France; John Wei; Ellen Wells; Patricia Goode
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Short-term results of robotic sacrocolpopexy using the Quill SRS bi-directional polydioxanone (PDO) suture.

Authors:  Joseph T Stubbs
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-04-17

10.  Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Linda Brubaker; Halina M Zyczynski; Geoffrey Cundiff; Holly Richter; Marie Gantz; Paul Fine; Shawn Menefee; Beri Ridgeway; Anthony Visco; Lauren Klein Warren; Min Zhang; Susan Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.