Literature DB >> 1449755

Asymmetries in the spatial localization of transformed targets.

R Chua1, R G Carson, D Goodman, D Elliott.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the contribution of the right cerebral hemisphere in the spatial localization of visual targets for manual aiming. Visual targets were briefly presented to the right and left fields and subjects were required to point either to the target location, or a "mirror" image of the target location with their right or left index finger. Whereas reaction times were faster for left-hand pointing than for right-hand pointing, there was no differential effect of the mirror image transformation. This suggests that left-hand reaction time advantages are more related to right hemisphere involvement in the spatial parameterization of the movement than spatial localization of the target.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1449755     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90017-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  13 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jon Bell; Clay B Holroyd; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Antisaccades exhibit diminished online control relative to prosaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Katie Dunham; Gordon Binsted; Bryan Godbolt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?

Authors:  David P Carey; Jonathan Liddle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.

Authors:  Jarugool Tretriluxana; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Saccadic-like visuomotor adaptation involves little if any perceptual effects.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Kinematic and kinetic evidence for functional lateralization in a symmetrical motor task: the water polo eggbeater kick.

Authors:  Nuno Oliveira; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; Andrzej Przybyla; Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.