Literature DB >> 14484733

Cochlear responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks.

W T PEAKE, N Y KIANG.   

Abstract

Auditory nerve responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks (CC and RC) have been recorded over a wide intensity range with gross electrodes. At low intensities the RC responses are nearly identical to CC responses. At high intensities RC and CC response waveforms are similar, but the latency of the N(1) peak in the RC response is 0.2 msec. shorter than that for the corresponding CC response. At intermediate intensities the RC and CC response waveforms are quite different. These results can be interpreted in terms of a model in which there are two excitatory mechanisms for the neural response, which are operative in different intensity ranges. The cochlear microphonic potential and a "slow" potential are suggested as possible excitatory mechanisms.

Keywords:  COCHLEA/physiology

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 14484733      PMCID: PMC1366386          DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86838-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  6 in total

1.  [A mechano-electrical theory of cochlear action].

Authors:  H DAVIS
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Components of electrical responses recorded from the cochlea.

Authors:  N Y KIANG; W PEAKE
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Biophysics and physiology of the inner ear.

Authors:  H DAVIS
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Modification of cochlear potentials produced by streptomycin poisoning and by extensive venous obstruction.

Authors:  H DAVIS; B H DEATHERAGE; B ROSENBLUT; C FERNANDEZ; R KIMURA; C A SMITH
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Electrical responses to acoustic stimuli recorded at the round window of the pigeon.

Authors:  G A HEISE; W A ROSENBLITH
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1952-10

6.  The excitatory process in the cochlea.

Authors:  H DAVIS; C FERNANDEZ; D R McAULIFFE
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  [Stimulation model of single neural elements of the cochlear nucleus of the waking cat after bilateral acoustic stimulation with sinus tones].

Authors:  B von Westernhagen; H K Oehlschlägel; M Blank
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1968

Review 2.  Cochlear transduction: an integrative model and review.

Authors:  W E Brownell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Field-induced forces at dielectric interfaces as a possible mechanism of RF hearing effects.

Authors:  W T Joines; B S Wilson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Temporal Envelope Coding of the Human Auditory Nerve Inferred from Electrocochleography: Comparison with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Jessica Chen; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Evidence that catecholamines are not the afferent transmitter in the cochlea.

Authors:  R Klinke; E F Evans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Quantitative evaluation of ototoxic side effects of furosemide, piretanide, bumetanide, azosemide and ozolinone in the cat--a new approach to the problem of ototoxicity.

Authors:  K H Göttl; A Roesch; R Klinke
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus.

Authors:  Jianwen Wendy Gu; Barbara S Herrmann; Robert A Levine; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-07

Review 8.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Kumar; Jayashree S Bhat; Pearl Edna D'Costa; Manav Srivastava; Mohan Kumar Kalaiah
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-01-03

10.  Putative Auditory-Evoked Neurophonic Measurements Using a Novel Signal Processing Technique: A Pilot Case Study.

Authors:  Alison M Cook; Ashleigh J Allsop; Greg A O'Beirne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.