Literature DB >> 1448075

Effect of terminal nonhomologies on homologous recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

S Jeong-Yu1, D Carroll.   

Abstract

Homologous recombination of linear DNA molecules in Xenopus laevis oocytes is very efficient. The predictions of molecular models for this recombination process were tested with substrates with terminal nonhomologies (nonhomologous sequences). It was found that nonhomologies on one or both ends of an otherwise efficient substrate substantially reduced the yield of recombination products. In the case of a single nonhomology, inhibition was observed for all lengths of nonhomology, from 60 to 1,690 bp, being most dramatic for the longer blocks. Examination of time courses of recombination showed that the blocks were largely kinetic; that is, substrates with short nonhomologies eventually yielded substantial levels of completed products. Intermediates that accumulated after the injection of end-blocked substrates were characterized by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and hybridization with strand-specific oligonucleotide probes. These blocked intermediates were shown to have base-paired junctions, but resolution was prevented by the failure to remove the 3'-ending strand of the original nonhomology. Continuing exonuclease action created a single-strand gap adjacent to the position of the persistent nonhomology. In contrast, the strand that included the unblocked side of the junction could be sealed. These results are consistent with a nonconservative, resection-annealing mechanism of homologous recombination in the oocytes and suggest the absence of any activity that can efficiently remove 3' tails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1448075      PMCID: PMC360480          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5426-5437.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  30 in total

1.  Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated.

Authors:  J Fishman-Lobell; N Rudin; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Test of the double-strand-break repair model of recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  S J Jeong-Yu; D Carroll
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Selective DNA conservation and chromatin assembly after injection of SV40 DNA into Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  A H Wyllie; R A Laskey; J Finch; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Recombination of DNAs in Xenopus oocytes based on short homologous overlaps.

Authors:  E Grzesiuk; D Carroll
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Mechanism for the action of lambda exonuclease in genetic recombination.

Authors:  E Cassuto; C M Radding
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-01-06

6.  Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.

Authors:  J W Szostak; T L Orr-Weaver; R J Rothstein; F W Stahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Transcription of tRNA genes in vivo: single-stranded compared to double-stranded templates.

Authors:  R Cortese; R Harland; D Melton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic recombination of bacteriophage lambda DNAs in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  D Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A unique pathway of double-strand break repair operates in tandemly repeated genes.

Authors:  B A Ozenberger; G S Roeder
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Stimulation of homologous recombination through targeted cleavage by chimeric nucleases.

Authors:  M Bibikova; D Carroll; D J Segal; J K Trautman; J Smith; Y G Kim; S Chandrasegaran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Processing of targeted psoralen cross-links in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  D J Segal; A F Faruqi; P M Glazer; D Carroll
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Role of exonucleolytic degradation in group I intron homing in phage T4.

Authors:  Y J Huang; M M Parker; M Belfort
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  In-frame recombination between the yeast H(+)-ATPase isogenes PMA1 and PMA2: insights into the mechanism of recombination initiated by a double-strand break.

Authors:  P Supply; A de Kerchove d'Exaerde; T Roganti; A Goffeau; F Foury
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Endonuclease-induced, targeted homologous extrachromosomal recombination in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  D J Segal; D Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Illegitimate recombination in Xenopus: characterization of end-joined junctions.

Authors:  C W Lehman; J K Trautman; D Carroll
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Homologous and illegitimate recombination in developing Xenopus oocytes and eggs.

Authors:  C W Lehman; M Clemens; D K Worthylake; J K Trautman; D Carroll
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the black chiton, Katharina tunicata.

Authors:  J L Boore; W M Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Repair of heteroduplex DNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  C W Lehman; S Jeong-Yu; J K Trautman; D Carroll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Distribution of exchanges upon homologous recombination of exogenous DNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  D Carroll; C W Lehman; S Jeong-Yu; P Dohrmann; R J Dawson; J K Trautman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.