Hill-Sachs lesion: comparison of detection with MR imaging, radiography, and arthroscopy.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved to be a valuable method for documenting Hill-Sachs lesions. The authors retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic interpretations at plain film radiography, arthroscopy, and MR imaging in 76 patients. The analysis revealed that neither radiography nor arthroscopy displayed the lesion with sufficient accuracy to represent a true standard of reference for the evaluation of MR imaging in the diagnosis of the Hill-Sachs lesion. The data from the diagnostic interpretations were analyzed in three ways, each of which revealed that findings at MR imaging were more helpful than findings at radiography and/or arthroscopy in the diagnosis of the Hill-Sachs lesion. When the agreement of findings in two or three methods was used to assign a final diagnosis, MR imaging resulted in sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 91%, and accuracy of 94% in the detection of Hill-Sachs lesions.