Literature DB >> 1438564

Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product.

J C Le Heron1.   

Abstract

Effective dose is likely to be used as a dose index for patient exposures in diagnostic radiology. Calculation of effective dose requires estimates of doses to many organs. In the absence of such dose data it would be useful to be able to directly estimate effective dose from a quantity that can be easily measured in the x-ray room. Relationships between effective dose and each of entrance surface dose, entrance air kerma and dose-area product were studied for common radiographic projections using the organ dose data from Monte Carlo modelling performed at the National Radiological Protection Board, UK. Dose-area product proved to be the best quantity for estimating effective dose and these data are presented. For typical peak generating potentials, estimates of effective dose can be made from dose-area product using a small number of conversion coefficients. For cervical spine, chest, kidneys, abdomen, lumbar spine and pelvis AP projections, the conversion coefficient 0.21 mSv per Gy cm2 will estimate effective dose within 30% of the value obtained using specific organ doses. Conversion coefficients for lateral and PA projections of the trunk are approximately half this value. These coefficients allow the direct estimation of effective dose with sufficient accuracy for most purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1438564     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/11/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Cardiac catheterisation: radiation doses and lifetime risk of malignancy.

Authors:  Kunadian Vijayalakshmi; Dee Kelly; Claire-Louise Chapple; David Williams; Robert Wright; Michael J Stewart; James A Hall; Andrew Sutton; Adrian Davies; John Haywood; Mark A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Radiation dose measurements in coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

4.  Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patric Kröpil; Roland Fenk; Lars B Fritz; Dirk Blondin; Guido Kobbe; Ulrich Mödder; Mathias Cohnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation Dose During Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies and Associated Factors in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Hyo Won Im; Seung Yeun Kim; Byung-Mo Oh; Tai Ryoon Han; Han Gil Seo
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Low-dose CT in body-packers: delineation of body packs and radiation dose in a porcine model.

Authors:  Michael K Scherr; Oliver Peschel; Jochen M Grimm; Edvard Ziegeler; Michael Uhl; Lucas L Geyer; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Ultra low-dose VCUG in children using a modern flat detectorunit.

Authors:  Sara Y S Linke; Ilias Tsiflikas; Klaus Herz; Phillipp Szavay; Sergios Gatidis; Jürgen F Schäfer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  An evaluation on novel application of cone-beam CT imaging with multi-volume technique in carotid body tumor.

Authors:  Lijia Cui; Guangchao Gu; Linchao Ye; Bao Liu; Jiang Shao; Changwei Liu; Yuehong Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Ahmad Farshid; Jaya Chandrasekhar; Donald McLean
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Effective dose--how effective for patients?

Authors:  G Drexler; W Panzer; N Petoussi; M Zankl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.