Literature DB >> 1437462

Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception.

B Gillam1, C Ryan.   

Abstract

Stereoscopic depth estimates are not predictable from the geometry of point disparities. The configural properties of surfaces (surface contours) may play an important role in determining, for example, slant responses to a disparity gradient, and the marked anisotropy in favour of slant around a horizontal axis. It has been argued that variation in slant magnitude are attributable to the degree of perspective conflict present and that anisotropy is attributable to orientation disparity, which varies with the axis of slant. Three experiments were conducted in which configural properties were varied to try and tease apart the respective roles of orientation disparity and conflicting perspective in determining stereoscopic slant perception and slant axis anisotropy. The results could not be accounted for by the magnitude of the orientation disparities present. Conflicting perspective cues appeared to play a role but only for slant around a vertical axis. It was concluded that there are important configural effects in stereopsis attributable neither to orientation disparity nor to perspective.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437462     DOI: 10.1068/p210427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

1.  The motion-induced contour revisited: Observations on 3-D structure and illusory contour formation in moving stimuli.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Mengzhu Fu; Michael D Dodd; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Integration of texture and disparity cues to surface slant in dorsal visual cortex.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; Hiroshi Ban; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generating an image that affords slant perception from stereo, without pictorial cues.

Authors:  J Galeotti; K Macdonald; J Wang; S Horvath; A Zhang; R Klatzky
Journal:  Displays       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.167

4.  Shape judgments in natural scenes: Convexity biases versus stereopsis.

Authors:  Brittney Hartle; Aishwarya Sudhama-Joseph; Elizabeth L Irving; Robert S Allison; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Laurie M Wilcox
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; William Herbert; Laura Villa-Laso; Michael Widdall; Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

Authors:  D A Wismeijer; R van Ee; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.