Literature DB >> 1434726

Comparative study of cefazolin, cefamandole, and vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis in cardiac and vascular operations. A double-blind randomized trial.

D G Maki1, M J Bohn, S M Stolz, G M Kroncke, C W Acher, P D Myerowitz.   

Abstract

Three-hundred twenty-one adults undergoing cardiac or major vascular operations were randomized to receive intravenous cefazolin, cefamandole, or vancomycin for prophylaxis against surgical infection in a double-blind trial. All three regimens provided therapeutic blood levels throughout operation in patients studied undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The prevalence of surgical wound infection was lowest with vancomycin (4 infections [3.7%] versus 14 [12.3%] and 13 [11.5%] in the cefazolin and cefamandole groups, respectively; p = 0.05); there were no thoracic wound infections in cardiac operations in the vancomycin group (p = 0.04). The mean duration of postoperative hospitalization was lowest in the vancomycin group (10.1 days; p < 0.01) and highest in the cefazolin group (12.9 days). Prophylaxis with vancomycin or cefamandole, compared with cefazolin, did not prevent nosocomial cutaneous colonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci; colonization or infection with vancomycin-resistant staphylococci or enterococci was not detected. Adverse effects attributable to the prophylactic regimen were infrequent in all three groups. Eight patients given vancomycin became hypotensive during administration of a dose, despite infusion during a 1-hour period; however, slowing the rate of administration and pretreating with diphenhydramine allowed vancomycin to be resumed and prophylaxis completed uneventfully in five of the patients. We conclude that administration of vancomycin (approximately 15 mg/kg), immediately preoperatively, provides therapeutic blood levels for surgical prophylaxis throughout most cardiac and vascular operations, resulting in protection against postoperative infection superior to that obtained with cefazolin or cefamandole. Vancomycin deserves consideration for inclusion in the prophylactic regimen (1) for prosthetic valve replacement and prosthetic vascular graft implantation, to reduce the risk of implant infection by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci; (2) for any cardiovascular operation if the patient has recently received broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy; and (3) for all cardiovascular operations in centers with a high prevalence of surgical infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci or enterococci. Guidelines for dosing and administration of vancomycin for cardiovascular surgical prophylaxis are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1434726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  18 in total

1.  The effect of thorough preoperative disinfection on the incidence of postoperative mediastinitis.

Authors:  H Inaba; T Miyairi; T Ohbuchi; K Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Microbiological aetiology, epidemiology, and clinical profile of prosthetic joint infections: are current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines effective?

Authors:  Trisha N Peel; Allen C Cheng; Kirsty L Buising; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A national survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery across Canada.

Authors:  Fran L Paradiso-Hardy; Patti Cornish; Chantal Pharand; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01

4.  Historical yearly usage of vancomycin.

Authors:  H A Kirst; D G Thompson; T I Nicas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Adjuvant vancomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of Clostridium difficile infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Jeremy A Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Katsiaryna Bykov; Jessica Myers Franklin; Joshua J Gagne; Jennifer M Polinski; Jun Liu; Alexander Kulik; Michael A Fischer; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Intraoperative redosing of cefazolin and risk for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G Zanetti; R Giardina; R Platt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Prospective randomized double-blinded trial comparing 2 anti-MRSA agents with supplemental coverage of cefazolin before lower extremity revascularization.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; Ali F AbuRahma; James R Campbell; Stephen M Hass; Albeir Y Mousa; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Mohit Srivastiva; Asmita Modak; Mary Emmett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Comparative prophylactic efficacies of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, cefazolin, and vancomycin in experimental model of staphylococcal wound infection.

Authors:  D S Kernodle; A B Kaiser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Non-observance of guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical-site infections.

Authors:  S Lallemand; M Thouverez; P Bailly; X Bertrand; D Talon
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-06

10.  Interrupted time series analysis of vancomycin compared to cefuroxime for surgical prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  K W Garey; D Lai; T K Dao-Tran; L O Gentry; L Y Hwang; B R Davis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.