Literature DB >> 1433686

A randomized clinical trial of high-dose epinephrine and norepinephrine vs standard-dose epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest.

M Callaham1, C D Madsen, C W Barton, C E Saunders, J Pointer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of high- vs standard-dose catecholamines in initial treatment of prehospital cardiac arrest.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial.
SETTING: Prehospital emergency medical system of a major US city. PATIENTS: All adults in nontraumatic cardiac arrest, treated by paramedics, who would receive epinephrine according to American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support guidelines.
INTERVENTIONS: High-dose epinephrine (HDE, 15 mg), high-dose norepinephrine bitartrate (NE, 11 mg), or standard-dose epinephrine (SDE, 1 mg) was blindly substituted for advanced cardiac life support doses of epinephrine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Restoration of spontaneous circulation in the field, admission to hospital, hospital discharge, and Cerebral Performance Category score.
RESULTS: Of 2694 patients with cardiac arrests during the study period, resuscitation was attempted on 1062 patients. Of this total, 816 patients met study criteria and were enrolled. In the entire cardiac arrest population, 63% of the survivors were among the 11% of patients who were defibrillated by first responders. The three drug treatment groups were similar for all independent variables. Thirteen percent of patients receiving HDE regained a pulse in the field vs 8% of those receiving SDE (P = .01), and 18% of HDE patients were admitted to the hospital vs 10% of SDE patients who were admitted to the hospital (P = .02). Similar trends for NE were not significant. There were 18 survivors; 1.7% of HDE patients and 2.6% of NE patients were discharged from the hospital compared with 1.2% of SDE patients, but this was not significant (P = .37; beta = .38). There was a nonsignificant trend for Cerebral Performance Category scores to be worse for HDE (3.2) and NE patients (3.7) than for SDE patients (2.3) (P = .10; beta = .31). No significant complications were identified. High-dose epinephrine did not produce longer hospital or critical care unit stays.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose epinephrine significantly improves the rate of return of spontaneous circulation and hospital admission in patients who are in prehospital cardiac arrest without increasing complications. However, the increase in hospital discharge rate is not statistically significant, and no significant trend could be determined for neurological outcome. No benefit of NE compared with HDE was identified. Further study is needed to determine the optimal role of epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1433686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Wanis H Ibrahim
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: advances in science, techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alexis A Topjian; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Attenuating the defibrillation dosage decreases postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction in a swine model of pediatric ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Isabelle L Banville; Fred W Chapman; Robert G Walker; Mohammed A Gaballa; Ronald W Hilwig; Ricardo A Samson; Karl B Kern; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support. Advanced Life Support Working Group of the European Resuscitation Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

Review 7.  Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.

Authors:  H Brazier; A W Murphy; C Lynch; G Bury
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

Review 8.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  A simple approach to studying cerebral blood flow during psychological stress.

Authors:  Nessaibia Issam; Sagese Raffaello; Siciliano Dafne; Cocci Luigi; Tahraoui Abdelkrim
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 10. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.