Literature DB >> 1432049

Acoustic reflex frequency selectivity in single stapedius motoneurons of the cat.

J B Kobler1, J J Guinan, S R Vacher, B E Norris.   

Abstract

1. The sound frequency selectivities of single stapedius motoneurons were investigated in ketamine anesthetized and in decerebrate cats by recording from axons in the small nerve fascicles entering the stapedius muscle. 2. Stapedius motoneuron tuning curves (TCs) were very broad, similar to the tuning of the overall acoustic reflexes as determined by electromyographic recordings. The lowest thresholds were usually for sound frequencies between 1 and 2 kHz, although many TCs also had a second sensitive region in the 6- to 12-kHz range. The broad tuning of stapedius motoneurons implies that inputs derived from different cochlear frequency regions (which are narrowly tuned) must converge at a point central to the stapedius motoneuron outputs, possibly at the motoneuron somata. 3. There were only small differences in tuning among the four previously described groups of stapedius motoneurons categorized by sensitivity to ipsilateral and contralateral sound. The gradation in high-frequency versus low-frequency sensitivity across motoneurons suggests there are not distinct subgroups of stapedius motoneurons, based on their TCs. 4. The thresholds and shapes of stapedius motoneuron TCs support the hypothesis that the stapedius acoustic reflex is triggered by summed activity of low-spontaneous-rate auditory nerve fibers with both low and high characteristic frequencies (CFs). Excitation of high-CF auditory nerve fibers by sound in their TC "tails" is probably an important factor in eliciting the reflex. 5. In general, the most sensitive frequency for stapedius motoneurons is higher than the frequency at which stapedius contractions produce the greatest attenuation of middle ear transmission. We argue that this is true because the main function of the stapedius acoustic reflex is to reduce the masking of responses to high-frequency sounds produced by low-frequency sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1432049     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  M C Brown; R K de Venecia; J J Guinan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings.

Authors:  M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Diverse synaptic terminals on rat stapedius motoneurons.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Thane E Benson; M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-18

6.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of cochlear synaptopathy on middle-ear muscle reflexes in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.