Literature DB >> 1429321

An analysis of a group teaching procedure for persons with developmental disabilities.

A C Repp1, K G Karsh.   

Abstract

This study evaluated whether a concurrent group teaching procedure, in which all students respond simultaneously, could be used for persons with moderate or severe mental retardation. The teaching procedure used was the Task Demonstration Model, a program based on stimulus-control research and the fading techniques of behavioral psychology. Three teachers and three groups of students participated. Results showed that the teachers increased their rates of questions and instructions, positive feedback, and use of functional materials, but they reduced their rate of prompts to almost zero. Students increased their percentage and rate of correct responding as well as their engaged time. In addition, maladaptive responding, for which there were never any direct consequences, decreased from 45% to 10% for 8 of the 14 students. Results are discussed primarily in two areas: (a) changing stimulus control from teacher prompts to critical elements of the items being taught, and (b) reasons for the reduction of maladaptive behavior for 8 of the subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1429321      PMCID: PMC1279752          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  14 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.

Authors:  L Schreibman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

3.  Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children.

Authors:  R L Koegel; A Rincover
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976

4.  The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children.

Authors:  M Sidman; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination training for persons with developmental disabilities: a comparison of the task demonstration model and the standard prompting hierarchy.

Authors:  A C Repp; K G Karsh; M W Lenz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

Review 6.  The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses.

Authors:  E G Carr
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The development of quality, quantity and durability in the work performance of retarded students in a public school prevocational workshop.

Authors:  L Brown; T Bellamy; L Perlmutter; P Sackowitz; E Sontag
Journal:  Train Sch Bull (Vinel)       Date:  1972-08

8.  Teaching autistic children to use extra-stimulus prompts.

Authors:  L Schreibman; M H Charlop; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1982-06

9.  A comparison of the Task Demonstration Model and the Standard Prompting Hierarchy in teaching word identification to persons with moderate retardation.

Authors:  K G Karsh; A C Repp; M W Lenz
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1990

10.  Teaching janitorial skills to the mentally retarded: acquisition, generalization, and maintenance.

Authors:  A J Cuvo; R B Leaf; L S Borakove
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.