OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activity of fleroxacin in acute uncomplicated infections with N. gonorrhoeae in comparison withconventional penicillin G plus probenecid treatment. DESIGN: Multicentre open label randomised parallel group study. SUBJECTS:Male patients aged 18 years or over from university departments of urology, epidemiology and dermatology and a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. INTERVENTIONS:Two hundred and sixty male patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either a single oral dose of fleroxacin 400 mg (130 patients) or a single intramuscular dose of penicillin G (2.4 or 5.0 mega units) plus a single oral dose of probenecid 1 gram (130 patients). Efficacy and safety assessments were undertaken at follow-up (3-14 days after treatment). Efficacy was assessed as bacteriological outcome of treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities and changes in vital signs. RESULTS:Two hundred and twenty four patients (114 in the fleroxacin group and 110 in thepenicillin plus probenecid group) were evaluated for efficacy. Bacteriological cures were achieved in 100% of patients in the fleroxacin group and 97% of patients in the penicillin plus probenecid group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in this respect (Fisher exact test, p = 0.25). Clinical cures were achieved in 100% of patients receiving fleroxacin and 95% of patients receiving penicillin plus probenecid. Safety analyses were undertaken on 255 patients (126 in the fleroxacin group and 129 in the penicillin plus probenecid group). No adverse events were reported for either treatment group, and no clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were apparent. Thus, there appeared to be no difference in the efficacy or safety of these two treatments when used to treat acute, uncomplicated urethral gonorrhoea in males. CONCLUSIONS: In this study fleroxacin proved to be highly effective therapy for uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis in males and may provide a favourable alternative to standard treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activity of fleroxacin in acute uncomplicated infections with N. gonorrhoeae in comparison with conventional penicillin G plus probenecid treatment. DESIGN: Multicentre open label randomised parallel group study. SUBJECTS: Male patients aged 18 years or over from university departments of urology, epidemiology and dermatology and a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. INTERVENTIONS: Two hundred and sixty male patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either a single oral dose of fleroxacin 400 mg (130 patients) or a single intramuscular dose of penicillin G (2.4 or 5.0 mega units) plus a single oral dose of probenecid 1 gram (130 patients). Efficacy and safety assessments were undertaken at follow-up (3-14 days after treatment). Efficacy was assessed as bacteriological outcome of treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities and changes in vital signs. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty four patients (114 in the fleroxacin group and 110 in the penicillin plus probenecid group) were evaluated for efficacy. Bacteriological cures were achieved in 100% of patients in the fleroxacin group and 97% of patients in the penicillin plus probenecid group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in this respect (Fisher exact test, p = 0.25). Clinical cures were achieved in 100% of patients receiving fleroxacin and 95% of patients receiving penicillin plus probenecid. Safety analyses were undertaken on 255 patients (126 in the fleroxacin group and 129 in the penicillin plus probenecid group). No adverse events were reported for either treatment group, and no clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were apparent. Thus, there appeared to be no difference in the efficacy or safety of these two treatments when used to treat acute, uncomplicated urethral gonorrhoea in males. CONCLUSIONS: In this study fleroxacin proved to be highly effective therapy for uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis in males and may provide a favourable alternative to standard treatment.